These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22881995)

  • 1. How to read fetal heart rate tracings in labor: a comparison between ACOG and NICE guidelines.
    Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Martorana R; Martino C; Tranquilli AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2797-8. PubMed ID: 22881995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
    Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines.
    Santo S; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Schnettler W; Ugwumadu A; Da Graça LM;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 27869985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observation on validity of the five-tier system for fetal heart rate pattern interpretation proposed by Japan Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Sadaka A; Furuhashi M; Minami H; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Ishikawa K
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 21923306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The medico-legal value of monitoring of the fetal heart rate during labor].
    Cynober E; Jeny R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(6):561-6; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 9453971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal heart rate in the second stage of labor: recording, reading, interpreting and acting.
    Tranquilli AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2551-4. PubMed ID: 22877246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems.
    Gyamfi Bannerman C; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Blackwell S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):288.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22071068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polemics in perinatology: the electronic fetal monitoring guidelines.
    Schifrin BS
    J Perinatol; 1990 Jun; 10(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 2358905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to Approach Intrapartum Category II Tracings.
    Timmins AE; Clark SL
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2015 Jun; 42(2):363-75. PubMed ID: 26002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns during the first stage of labor: effect on perinatal outcome.
    Hadar A; Sheiner E; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):863-8. PubMed ID: 11641667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of fuzzy inference systems for classification of fetal heart rate tracings in relation to neonatal outcome.
    Czabański R; Jezewski J; Wróbel J; Sikora J; Jezewski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 23488308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The legal effects of fetal monitoring guidelines.
    Dickens BM; Cook RJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 108(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 19932651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra- and interobserver agreement among obstetric experts in court regarding the review of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and obstetrical management.
    Sabiani L; Le Dû R; Loundou A; d'Ercole C; Bretelle F; Boubli L; Carcopino X
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):856.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26348383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal heart rate classification proposed by the perinatology committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology: reproducibility and clinical usefulness.
    Hayashi M; Nakai A; Sekiguchi A; Takeshita T
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2012; 79(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 22398791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Managing nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns before cesarean delivery. Compliance with ACOG recommendations.
    Hendrix NW; Chauhan SP; Scardo JA; Ellings JM; Devoe LD
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Dec; 45(12):995-9. PubMed ID: 11153261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal ECG analysis for intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a review.
    Devoe LD
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 21278502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Labor and fetal heart rate decelerations: relation to fetal metabolic acidosis.
    Ross MG
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 21278504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ACOG guidelines on antepartum fetal surveillance. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Preboth M
    Am Fam Physician; 2000 Sep; 62(5):1184, 1187-8. PubMed ID: 10997537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.