These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22882150)

  • 1. Dynamic accommodative response to different visual stimuli (2D vs 3D) while watching television and while playing Nintendo 3DS console.
    Oliveira S; Jorge J; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):383-9. PubMed ID: 22882150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heterophoria adaptation during the viewing of 3D stereoscopic stimuli.
    Karpicka E; Howarth PA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Sep; 33(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 23859603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stereoscopic viewing and reported perceived immersion and symptoms.
    Yang SN; Schlieski T; Selmins B; Cooper SC; Doherty RA; Corriveau PJ; Sheedy JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1068-80. PubMed ID: 22733100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual fatigue and discomfort after stereoscopic display viewing.
    Zhang L; Zhang YQ; Zhang JS; Xu L; Jonas JB
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 91(2):e149-53. PubMed ID: 23164154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Visual fatigue evaluation of field sequential stereoscopic 3D display using near point distance].
    Yamazaki T; Kamijo K
    Ann Physiol Anthropol; 1989 Jul; 8(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 2803369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Illumination on Ocular Status Modifications Induced by Short-Term 3D TV Viewing.
    Chen Y; Wang Y; Yu X; Xu A; Jiang J; Chen H
    Neural Plast; 2017; 2017():1432037. PubMed ID: 28348893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional display-induced transient myopia and the difference in myopic shift between crossed and uncrossed disparities.
    Suh YW; Oh J; Kim HM; Cho YA; Song JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 53(8):5029-32. PubMed ID: 22761261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of accommodation and ocular surface stability relevant to visual asthenopia with 3D displays.
    Wee SW; Moon NJ
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 14():29. PubMed ID: 24612686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in ocular factors according to depth variation and viewer age after watching a three-dimensional display.
    Yum HR; Park SH; Kang HB; Shin SY
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 98(5):684-90. PubMed ID: 24457372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between CA/C ratio and individual differences in dynamic accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images.
    Fukushima T; Torii M; Ukai K; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    J Vis; 2009 Dec; 9(13):21.1-13. PubMed ID: 20055554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The accommodative characteristics of gazing at stereoscopic images on a 3-D display].
    Iwasaki T; Tawara A
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 108(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 14969087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D asthenopia in horizontal deviation.
    Kim SH; Suh YW; Yun CM; Yoo EJ; Yeom JH; Cho YA
    Curr Eye Res; 2013 May; 38(5):614-9. PubMed ID: 23406011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of watching 3-dimensional television on refractive error in children.
    Kim SH; Suh YW; Choi YM; Han JY; Nam GT; You EJ; Cho YA
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 25646061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual discomfort and objective measures of static accommodation.
    Chase C; Tosha C; Borsting E; Ridder WH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 86(7):883-9. PubMed ID: 19521268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of apparent depth in pictorial images on accommodation.
    Busby A; Ciuffreda KJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 15953117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of the Immediate Effects of Autostereoscopic 3D Visual Training on the Accommodative Functions of Myopes.
    Huang Y; Li M; Shen Y; Liu F; Fang Y; Xu H; Zhou X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2022 Feb; 63(2):9. PubMed ID: 35113140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An exploration of the initial effects of stereoscopic displays on optometric parameters.
    Fortuin MF; Lambooij MT; Ijsselsteijn WA; Heynderickx I; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jan; 31(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 21158883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The response AC/A ratio: differences between inducing and relaxing accommodation at different distances of fixation.
    Pankhania SR; Firth AY
    Strabismus; 2011 Jun; 19(2):52-6. PubMed ID: 21635166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ophthalmological factors influencing visual asthenopia as a result of viewing 3D displays.
    Wee SW; Moon NJ; Lee WK; Jeon S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 96(11):1391-4. PubMed ID: 22952400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Apparent size of stereoscopic images with disparity in relation to the function of accommodation].
    Iwasaki T; Tawara A
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Feb; 105(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 11235200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.