These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2288239)

  • 1. Assessing threats to the validity of experimental and observational designs.
    Rogers JC; Holloway RL
    Fam Pract Res J; 1990; 10(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 2288239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods in epidemiology: observational study designs.
    DiPietro NA
    Pharmacotherapy; 2010 Oct; 30(10):973-84. PubMed ID: 20874034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study designs in clinical research.
    Noordzij M; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2009; 113(3):c218-21. PubMed ID: 19690439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Research designs and levels of evidence].
    Aartman IH; van Loveren C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2007 Apr; 114(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 17484412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A reconsideration of operations research experimental designs.
    Reynolds J
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 371():377-94. PubMed ID: 1956897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in research.
    Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Searching the biomedical literature: research study designs and critical appraisal.
    Callas PW
    Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18335861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Types of studies, power of study and choice of test].
    Hren D; Lukić KI
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():47-62. PubMed ID: 16526307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Research methods in clinical cardiology (I). Types of basic designs. Observational studies in clinical cardiology (I)].
    Gabriel Sánchez R; Gómez de la Cámara A
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 49(11):837-51. PubMed ID: 9082496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: randomization to the rescue.
    Kratochwill TR; Levin JR
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):124-44. PubMed ID: 20515235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of cohort study design for cardiovascular nursing research.
    Hood MN
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 24(6):E1-9. PubMed ID: 19858946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Primer on Single-Case Research Designs: Contemporary Use and Analysis.
    Ledford JR; Barton EE; Severini KE; Zimmerman KN
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2019 Jan; 124(1):35-56. PubMed ID: 30715924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quasi experimental evaluation of public health interventions (author's transl)].
    Patrick DL
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1981; 29(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 7302309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review.
    Sidani S; Miranda J; Epstein D; Fox M
    Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Dec; 41(4):52-67. PubMed ID: 20191713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From randomized controlled trials to observational studies.
    Silverman SL
    Am J Med; 2009 Feb; 122(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 19185083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The designs and methods of published nursing research: 1956-1983.
    Jacobsen BS; Meininger JC
    Nurs Res; 1985; 34(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 3900933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
    von Elm E; Altman DG; Egger M; Pocock SJ; Gøtzsche PC; Vandenbroucke JP;
    Epidemiology; 2007 Nov; 18(6):800-4. PubMed ID: 18049194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observational studies: going beyond the boundaries of randomized controlled trials.
    Yang W; Zilov A; Soewondo P; Bech OM; Sekkal F; Home PD
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 20466165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why, when, and how should pharmacogenetics be applied in clinical studies?: current and future approaches to study designs.
    Stingl Kirchheiner JC; Brockmöller J
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Feb; 89(2):198-209. PubMed ID: 21209614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based dentistry: Part IV. Research design and levels of evidence.
    Sutherland SE
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2001; 67(7):375-8. PubMed ID: 11468093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.