102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22882794)
1. Accuracy of HistoScanning™ for the prediction of a negative surgical margin in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Salomon G; Spethmann J; Beckmann A; Autier P; Moore C; Durner L; Sandmann M; Haese A; Schlomm T; Michl U; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Steuber T
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 22882794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of nerve sparing on incidence and location of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy.
Moore BM; Savdie R; PeBenito RA; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Delprado W; Rasiah KK; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21711436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does prostate HistoScanning™ play a role in detecting prostate cancer in routine clinical practice? Results from three independent studies.
Javed S; Chadwick E; Edwards AA; Beveridge S; Laing R; Bott S; Eden C; Langley S
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 24224648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sextant-Specific Analysis of Detection and Tumor Volume by HistoScanning™.
Porres D; Kuru TH; Epplen R; Eck A; Zugor V; Kennes LN; Afram S; Braunschweig T; Knüchel-Clarke R; Pfister D; Heidenreich A
Urol Int; 2016; 96(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 26555799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prostate cancer volume measured by HistoScanning™ and final histopathological results.
Schiffmann J; Fischer J; Tennstedt P; Beyer B; Böhm K; Michl U; Graefen M; Salomon G
World J Urol; 2014 Aug; 32(4):939-44. PubMed ID: 24270968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective analysis of the distance between the neurovascular bundle and prostate cancer foci in radical prostatectomy specimens: its clinical implication in nerve-sparing surgery.
Inoue S; Shiina H; Hiraoka T; Mitsui Y; Sumura M; Urakami S; Igawa M
BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1085-90. PubMed ID: 19388988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients.
Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Huxhold C; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Hansen J; Budäus L; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Minner S; Haese A; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2012 Aug; 62(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 22591631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study.
Fromont G; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Validire P; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1843-6. PubMed ID: 14532789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frozen section evaluation of margins in radical prostatectomy specimens: a contemporary study and literature review.
Nunez AL; Giannico GA; Mukhtar F; Dailey V; El-Galley R; Hameed O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Oct; 24():11-8. PubMed ID: 27649947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Histoscanning™ prior to prostate biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma.
Núñez-Mora C; García-Mediero JM; Patiño P; Orellana C; Garrido A; Rojo A; Rendón D
Actas Urol Esp; 2013 Jun; 37(6):342-6. PubMed ID: 23507291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure.
Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; Graefen M; Erbersdobler A; Haese A; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 15661411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frozen section for the management of intraoperatively detected palpable tumor lesions during nerve-sparing scheduled radical prostatectomy.
Eichelberg C; Erbersdobler A; Haese A; Schlomm T; Chun FK; Currlin E; Walz J; Steuber T; Graefen M; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2006 Jun; 49(6):1011-6; discussion 1016-8. PubMed ID: 16546316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A feasible and time-efficient adaptation of NeuroSAFE for da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Beyer B; Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Boehm K; Adam M; Schiffmann J; Sauter G; Wittmer C; Steuber T; Graefen M; Huland H; Haese A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 24411279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors predicting prostatic biopsy Gleason sum under grading.
Stackhouse DA; Sun L; Schroeck FR; Jayachandran J; Caire AA; Acholo CO; Robertson CN; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Donatucci CF; Maloney KE; Moul JW
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):118-22; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 19447436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
