These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22883714)

  • 1. Utility of the digital rectal examination in the emergency department: a review.
    Kessler C; Bauer SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 43(6):1196-204. PubMed ID: 22883714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evidence for the digital rectal examination in the emergency assessment of acute abdominal pain].
    Werner JC; Zock M; Khalil PN; Hoffmann J; Kanz KG; Jauch KW
    Zentralbl Chir; 2013 Dec; 138(6):669-76. PubMed ID: 22144138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of the digital rectal examination in the evaluation of undifferentiated abdominal pain.
    Quaas J; Lanigan M; Newman D; McOsker J; Babayev R; Mason C
    Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 27(9):1125-9. PubMed ID: 19931762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Evaluation of Digital Rectal Examination for Assessment of Anal Tone in Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome.
    Sherlock KE; Turner W; Elsayed S; Bagouri M; Baha L; Boszczyk BM; McNally D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(15):1213-8. PubMed ID: 25811266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IS THE PHYSICIAN EXPERTISE IN DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION OF VALUE IN DETECTING ANAL TONE IN COMPARISON TO ANORECTAL MANOMETRY?
    Pinto RA; Corrêa Neto IJF; Nahas SC; Froehner Junior I; Soares DFM; Cecconello I
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2019; 56(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 31141075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic value of a digital rectal examination compared with high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence.
    Soh JS; Lee HJ; Jung KW; Yoon IJ; Koo HS; Seo SY; Lee S; Bae JH; Lee HS; Park SH; Yang DH; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Yang SK; Kim JH; Myung SJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1197-204. PubMed ID: 26032152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital rectal examination versus spontaneous passage of stool for fecal occult blood testing.
    Ashraf I; Paracha SR; Arif M; Choudhary A; Matteson ML; Clark RE; Godfrey JD; Hammad HT; Bechtold ML
    South Med J; 2012 Jul; 105(7):357-61. PubMed ID: 22766663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of removal of point-of-care fecal occult blood testing on performance of digital rectal examinations in the emergency department.
    Cleveland NJ; Yaron M; Ginde AA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Aug; 56(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 20060198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical utilization of digital rectal examination and fecal occult blood testing upon hospital admission.
    Scales CD; Fein S; Muir AJ; Rockey DC
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006; 40(10):913-8. PubMed ID: 17063111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significance of routine digital rectal examination in adults presenting with abdominal pain.
    Manimaran N; Galland RB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2004 Jul; 86(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 15239875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the digital rectal examination as an estimate of anal sphincter squeeze pressure.
    Kaushal JN; Goldner F
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Jul; 86(7):886-7. PubMed ID: 2058632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can digital examination substitute anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal canal pressures?
    Buch E; Alós R; Solana A; Roig JV; Fernández C; Díaz F
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1998 Feb; 90(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 9567642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of white blood cell count and left shift in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.
    Wang LT; Prentiss KA; Simon JZ; Doody DP; Ryan DP
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2007 Feb; 23(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 17351404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic yield of a positive fecal occult blood test found on digital rectal examination. Does the finger count?
    Eisner MS; Lewis JH
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Nov; 151(11):2180-4. PubMed ID: 1953220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital rectal examination of sphincter pressures in chronic anal fissure is unreliable.
    Jones OM; Ramalingam T; Lindsey I; Cunningham C; George BD; Mortensen NJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Feb; 48(2):349-52. PubMed ID: 15812586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can digital rectal examination be used to detect cauda equina compression in people presenting with acute cauda equina syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Tabrah J; Wilson N; Phillips D; Böhning D
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2022 Apr; 58():102523. PubMed ID: 35180641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic characteristics of S100A8/A9 in a multicenter study of patients with acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain.
    Mills AM; Huckins DS; Kwok H; Baumann BM; Ruddy RM; Rothman RE; Schrock JW; Lovecchio F; Krief WI; Hexdall A; Caspari R; Cohen B; Lewis RJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2012 Jan; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22221415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Role of Digital Rectal Examination for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Takada T; Nishiwaki H; Yamamoto Y; Noguchi Y; Fukuma S; Yamazaki S; Fukuhara S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136996. PubMed ID: 26332867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective evaluation of the use and outcome of admission stool guaiac testing: the Digital Rectal Examination on Admission to the Medical Service (DREAMS) Study.
    Bini EJ; Reinhold JP; Weinshel EH; Generoso R; Salman L; Dahr G; Pena-Sing I
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 40(9):821-7. PubMed ID: 17016139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: use the finger.
    Burke CA; Tadikonda L; Machicao V
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Nov; 96(11):3175-7. PubMed ID: 11721767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.