BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22884255)

  • 1. A new paradigm for calculating skin dose.
    Gifford KA; Pacha O; Hebert AA; Nelson CL; Kirsner SM; Ballo MT; Bloom ES
    Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 22884255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling study for optimization of skin dose for partial breast irradiation using Xoft Axxent electronic brachytherapy applicator.
    Hepel JT; Hiatt JR; Cardarelli GA; Wazer DE
    Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 19850533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A low-dose ipsilateral lung restriction improves 3-d conformal planning for partial breast radiation therapy.
    Mitchell T; Truong PT; Salter L; Graham C; Gaffney H; Beckham W; Olivotto IA
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 20097058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.
    Knöös T; Wieslander E; Cozzi L; Brink C; Fogliata A; Albers D; Nyström H; Lassen S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5785-807. PubMed ID: 17068365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculation and prediction of the effect of respiratory motion on whole breast radiation therapy dose distributions.
    Cao J; Roeske JC; Chmura SJ; Salama JK; Shoushtari AN; Boyer AL; Martel MK
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 19410141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
    Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A phase I/II trial to evaluate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for Stage I/II breast carcinoma: initial report of feasibility and reproducibility of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Study 0319.
    Vicini F; Winter K; Straube W; Wong J; Pass H; Rabinovitch R; Chafe S; Arthur D; Petersen I; McCormick B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Dec; 63(5):1531-7. PubMed ID: 16198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving dose homogeneity in large breasts by IMRT: efficacy and dosimetric accuracy of different techniques.
    Abo-Madyan Y; Polednik M; Rahn A; Schneider F; Dobler B; Wenz F; Lohr F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18259700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A separated primary and scatter model for independent dose calculation of intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Baker CR; Clements R; Gately A; Budgell GJ
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Sep; 80(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 16956682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Helical tomotherapy-based STAT RT: Dosimetric evaluation for clinical implementation of a rapid radiation palliation program.
    McIntosh A; Dunlap N; Sheng K; Geezey C; Turner B; Blackhall L; Weiss G; Lappinen E; Larner JM; Read PW
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 19944589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equivalent uniform dose concept evaluated by theoretical dose volume histograms for thoracic irradiation.
    Dumas JL; Lorchel F; Perrot Y; Aletti P; Noel A; Wolf D; Courvoisier P; Bosset JF
    Phys Med; 2007 Mar; 23(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17568539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intensity modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: the sensitivity of plan objectives and constraints to set-up uncertainty.
    Ploquin N; Song W; Lau H; Dunscombe P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3515-33. PubMed ID: 16030380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On comparing the quality of head and neck IMRT plans delivered with two different linear accelerator manufacturers.
    Basran PS; Balogh J; Poon I; MacKenzie R; Chan T
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20346644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin-sparing helical tomotherapy vs 3D-conformal radiotherapy for adjuvant breast radiotherapy: in vivo skin dosimetry study.
    Capelle L; Warkentin H; Mackenzie M; Joseph K; Gabos Z; Pervez N; Tankel K; Chafe S; Amanie J; Ghosh S; Parliament M; Abdulkarim B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):e583-90. PubMed ID: 22580119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface and build-up region dose analysis for clinical radiotherapy photon beams.
    Ishmael Parsai E; Shvydka D; Pearson D; Gopalakrishnan M; Feldmeier JJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1438-42. PubMed ID: 18434173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
    Ludlum E; Xia P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity-corrected vs -uncorrected critical structure maximum point doses in breast balloon brachytherapy.
    Kim L; Narra V; Yue N
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 23474368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic online adaptive radiation therapy techniques for targets with significant shape change: a feasibility study.
    Court LE; Tishler RB; Petit J; Cormack R; Chin L
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2493-501. PubMed ID: 16675865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Omni-wedge technique for increased dose homogeneity in head and neck radiotherapy.
    Vinagre FL; Simões PC; Rachinhas PJ
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 19299178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
    Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.