150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22884343)
21. Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection.
Goddard ME; Hayes BJ; Meuwissen TH
J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):409-21. PubMed ID: 22059574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breeding and Genetics Symposium: really big data: processing and analysis of very large data sets.
Cole JB; Newman S; Foertter F; Aguilar I; Coffey M
J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):723-33. PubMed ID: 22100598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the utility of diagonal elements of the genomic relationship matrix as a diagnostic tool to detect mislabelled genotyped animals in a broiler chicken population.
Simeone R; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Legarra A
J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Oct; 128(5):386-93. PubMed ID: 21906184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects.
Liu Z; Goddard ME; Reinhardt F; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5833-50. PubMed ID: 25022678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information.
Misztal I; Legarra A; Aguilar I
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4648-55. PubMed ID: 19700728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction.
Legarra A; Ducrocq V
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4629-45. PubMed ID: 22818478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.
Mäntysaari EA; Evans RD; Strandén I
J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4728-4737. PubMed ID: 29293736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Lawlor TJ; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4090-4. PubMed ID: 25864050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient.
Masuda Y; Misztal I; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DA; Fragomeni BO; Aguilar I
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 28177357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Short communication: Methods to compute genomic inbreeding for ungenotyped individuals.
Legarra A; Aguilar I; Colleau JJ
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3363-3367. PubMed ID: 32057428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A fast indirect method to compute functions of genomic relationships concerning genotyped and ungenotyped individuals, for diversity management.
Colleau JJ; Palhière I; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):87. PubMed ID: 29191178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Considering dominance in reduced single-step genomic evaluations.
Ertl J; Edel C; Pimentel ECG; Emmerling R; Götz KU
J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Jun; 135(3):151-158. PubMed ID: 29582470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information.
Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 22192217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single-step genomic evaluation procedure.
Simeone R; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Vitezica ZG
J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Feb; 129(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 22225579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Technical note: recursive algorithm for inbreeding coefficients assuming nonzero inbreeding of unknown parents.
Aguilar I; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1669-72. PubMed ID: 18349260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
