207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22884568)
1. Assessment of brain glucose metabolism with input function determined from brain PET images by means of Bayesian ICA and MCMC methods.
Berradja K; Boughanmi N
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2012 Dec; 36(8):620-6. PubMed ID: 22884568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of the image-derived carotid artery input function using independent component analysis for the quantitation of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography images.
Chen K; Chen X; Renaut R; Alexander GE; Bandy D; Guo H; Reiman EM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7055-71. PubMed ID: 18029993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodologic Considerations for Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Studies of Hepatic Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Subjects.
Trägårdh M; Møller N; Sørensen M
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1366-71. PubMed ID: 26159590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extraction of a plasma time-activity curve from dynamic brain PET images based on independent component analysis.
Naganawa M; Kimura Y; Ishii K; Oda K; Ishiwata K; Matani A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 15709657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification method in [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose brain positron emission tomography using independent component analysis.
Su KH; Wu LC; Liu RS; Wang SJ; Chen JC
Nucl Med Commun; 2005 Nov; 26(11):995-1004. PubMed ID: 16208178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the input function non-invasively for FDG-PET quantification with multiple linear regression analysis: simulation and verification with in vivo data.
Fang YH; Kao T; Liu RS; Wu LC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 May; 31(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 14740178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of estimation of brain volume and 2-deoxy-2-(18)F-fluoro-D-glucose metabolism using a novel automated image analysis method: application in Alzheimer's disease.
Musiek ES; Saboury B; Mishra S; Chen Y; Reddin JS; Newberg AB; Udupa JK; Detre JA; Hofheinz F; Torigian D; Alavi A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2012; 15(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 23106049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 3 methods of automated internal carotid segmentation in human brain PET studies: application to the estimation of arterial input function.
Zanotti-Fregonara P; Maroy R; Comtat C; Jan S; Gaura V; Bar-Hen A; Ribeiro MJ; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2009 Mar; 50(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 19223421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voxel- and ROI-based statistical analyses of PET parameters for guidance in the surgical treatment of intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
Ohta Y; Nariai T; Ishii K; Ishiwata K; Mishina M; Senda M; Hirakawa K; Ohno K
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 22(6):495-503. PubMed ID: 18670856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kinetic quantitation of cerebral PET-FDG studies without concurrent blood sampling: statistical recovery of the arterial input function.
O'Sullivan F; Kirrane J; Muzi M; O'Sullivan JN; Spence AM; Mankoff DA; Krohn KA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):610-24. PubMed ID: 19709971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An input function estimation method for FDG-PET human brain studies.
Guo H; Renaut RA; Chen K
Nucl Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 34(5):483-92. PubMed ID: 17591548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PET imaging of serotonin transporters with [11C]DASB: test-retest reproducibility using a multilinear reference tissue parametric imaging method.
Kim JS; Ichise M; Sangare J; Innis RB
J Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 16455625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FDG-PET parametric imaging by total variation minimization.
Guo H; Renaut RA; Chen K; Reiman E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 19261438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simplifications in analyzing positron emission tomography data: effects on outcome measures.
Logan J; Alexoff D; Kriplani A
Nucl Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 34(7):743-56. PubMed ID: 17921027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shortened acquisition protocols for the quantitative assessment of the 2-tissue-compartment model using dynamic PET/CT 18F-FDG studies.
Strauss LG; Pan L; Cheng C; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
J Nucl Med; 2011 Mar; 52(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 21321263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic positron emission tomography data-driven analysis using sparse Bayesian learning.
Peng JY; Aston JA; Gunn RN; Liou CY; Ashburner J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1356-69. PubMed ID: 18753048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 18F-FDG PET findings in frontotemporal dementia: an SPM analysis of 29 patients.
Jeong Y; Cho SS; Park JM; Kang SJ; Lee JS; Kang E; Na DL; Kim SE
J Nucl Med; 2005 Feb; 46(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 15695781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image derived input functions for dynamic High Resolution Research Tomograph PET brain studies.
Mourik JE; van Velden FH; Lubberink M; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Neuroimage; 2008 Dec; 43(4):676-86. PubMed ID: 18707007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extraction of time activity curves from gated FDG-PET images for small animals' heart studies.
Mabrouk R; Dubeau F; Bentourkia M; Bentabet L
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2012 Sep; 36(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 22658459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
