These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2288489)

  • 1. [Determinants of juror decision making: an example for using time series analysis in legal psychology].
    Kette G
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1990; 142(1):59-80. PubMed ID: 2288489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When emotionality trumps reason: a study of individual processing style and juror bias.
    Gunnell JJ; Ceci SJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):850-77. PubMed ID: 20583074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
    Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
    Czerner F
    Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gruesome evidence and emotion: anger, blame, and jury decision-making.
    Bright DA; Goodman-Delahunty J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 16786406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Intuitive evaluation of guilt of violent offenders in relation to offender personality].
    Endres J
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):353-85. PubMed ID: 8640478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.
    McCabe DP; Castel AD; Rhodes MG
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 21751243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex, sexual orientation, and sexism: what influence do these factors have on verdicts in a crime-of-passion case?
    Ragatz LL; Russell B
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 20718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of defendant age on severity of punishment for different crimes.
    Bergeron CE; McKelvie SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 144(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 14760966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intentional or Negligent Homicide? Evidence for Juror Decision Making.
    Gambetti E; Nori R; Giusberti F
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Oct; 119(2):395-410. PubMed ID: 27469365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: a meta-analytic review of defendant treatment.
    Mitchell TL; Haw RM; Pfeifer JE; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):621-37. PubMed ID: 16382353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Failure of All Mothers or the Mother of All Failures? Juror Perceptions of Failure to Protect Laws.
    Stanziani M; Cox J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):NP690-NP711. PubMed ID: 29294952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotion and the law: a framework for inquiry.
    Wiener RL; Bornstein BH; Voss A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):231-48. PubMed ID: 16786409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating juror accuracy, juror ability, and the relationship between them.
    Park K
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):288-305. PubMed ID: 20658261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: a comparison of criteria for assessing the competence of criminal defendants.
    Bonnie RJ; Hoge SK; Monahan J; Poythress N; Eisenberg M; Feucht-Haviar T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 9323652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.