These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22885406)
1. Determining electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds: a comparison of computer versus human analysis methods. Glassman EK; Hughes ML Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 22885406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of auditory nerve functional states on the correlations between human and computer decisions for electrically evoked compound action potential threshold. Li Q; Zhang C; Lu T; Xu C; Sun Z; Fan W; Wang Z; Li S Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109866. PubMed ID: 31945736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant. Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials. Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test/Retest Variability of the eCAP Threshold in Advanced Bionics Cochlear Implant Users. Stronks HC; Biesheuvel JD; de Vos JJ; Boot MS; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1457-1466. PubMed ID: 30946135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants. Hughes ML; Stille LJ Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap. Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users. Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential. Hughes ML; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):332-343. PubMed ID: 28045836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Site of prelingual cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials and refractory using the Nucleus 24 standard]. Ma RY; Li W; Jiang XJ Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1854-1858. PubMed ID: 29798012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants. Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users. Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can ECAP measures be used for totally objective programming of cochlear implants? McKay CM; Chandan K; Akhoun I; Siciliano C; Kluk K J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 14(6):879-90. PubMed ID: 24048907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health. Hughes ML J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 23(2):301-318. PubMed ID: 34988867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds. Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application]. Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential. Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves. Xu L; Skidmore J; Luo J; Chao X; Wang R; Wang H; He S Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1306-1319. PubMed ID: 32141933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]