These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22885589)

  • 21. Comparison of curvature-based and Shack-Hartmann-based adaptive optics for the Gemini telescope.
    Rigaut F; Ellerbroek BL; Northcott MJ
    Appl Opt; 1997 May; 36(13):2856-68. PubMed ID: 18253284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of methods for the reduction of reconstructed layers in atmospheric tomography.
    Saxenhuber D; Auzinger G; Louarn ML; Helin T
    Appl Opt; 2017 Apr; 56(10):2621-2629. PubMed ID: 28375221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Fusco T; Conan JM; Rousset G; Mugnier LM; Michau V
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Oct; 18(10):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11583270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving centroiding by super-resolution reconstruction of sodium layer density in Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors.
    Mello AJ; Pipa DR
    Appl Opt; 2016 May; 55(14):3701-10. PubMed ID: 27168279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Isoplanatism in a multiconjugate adaptive optics system.
    Tokovinin A; Le Louarn M; Sarazin M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Oct; 17(10):1819-27. PubMed ID: 11028530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simulation model based approach for long exposure atmospheric point spread function reconstruction for laser guide star multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Gilles L; Correia C; Véran JP; Wang L; Ellerbroek B
    Appl Opt; 2012 Nov; 51(31):7443-58. PubMed ID: 23128690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preconditioned conjugate gradient wave-front reconstructors for multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Gilles L; Ellerbroek BL; Vogel CR
    Appl Opt; 2003 Sep; 42(26):5233-50. PubMed ID: 14503692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Convolutional Neural Networks Approach for Solar Reconstruction in SCAO Configurations.
    Suárez Gómez SL; González-Gutiérrez C; García Riesgo F; Sánchez Rodríguez ML; Javier Iglesias Rodríguez F; Santos JD
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 May; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 31091820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimal control law for classical and multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Le Roux B; Conan JM; Kulcsár C; Raynaud HF; Mugnier LM; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1261-76. PubMed ID: 15260258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential focal anisoplanatism in laser guide star wavefront sensing on extremely large telescopes.
    Muller N; Michau V; Robert C; Rousset G
    Opt Lett; 2011 Oct; 36(20):4071-3. PubMed ID: 22002389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Open-loop control of liquid-crystal spatial light modulators for vertical atmospheric turbulence wavefront correction.
    Liu C; Hu L; Mu Q; Cao Z; Xuan L
    Appl Opt; 2011 Jan; 50(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 21221164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of modes and behavior of a multiconjugate adaptive optics system.
    Le Louarn M; Tallon M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 May; 19(5):912-25. PubMed ID: 11999967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Calibrating the interaction matrix for the LINC-NIRVANA high layer wavefront sensor.
    Zhang X; Arcidiacono C; Conrad AR; Herbst TM; Gaessler W; Bertram T; Ragazzoni R; Schreiber L; Diolaiti E; Kuerster M; Bizenberger P; Meschke D; Rix HW; Rao C; Mohr L; Briegel F; Kittmann F; Berwein J; Trowitzsch J
    Opt Express; 2012 Mar; 20(7):8078-92. PubMed ID: 22453479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wavefront detection method of a single-sensor based adaptive optics system.
    Wang C; Hu L; Xu H; Wang Y; Li D; Wang S; Mu Q; Yang C; Cao Z; Lu X; Xuan L
    Opt Express; 2015 Aug; 23(16):21403-13. PubMed ID: 26367988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wavefront reconstruction for extremely large telescopes via CuRe with domain decomposition.
    Rosensteiner M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Nov; 29(11):2328-36. PubMed ID: 23201793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adaptive-optics performance of Antarctic telescopes.
    Lawrence JS
    Appl Opt; 2004 Feb; 43(6):1435-49. PubMed ID: 15008551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Wide field adaptive optics laboratory demonstration with closed-loop tomographic control.
    Costille A; Petit C; Conan JM; Kulcsár C; Raynaud HF; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Mar; 27(3):469-83. PubMed ID: 20208937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Numerical simulations of multiconjugate adaptive optics wave-front reconstruction on giant telescopes.
    Ellerbroek BL; Gilles L; Vogel CR
    Appl Opt; 2003 Aug; 42(24):4811-8. PubMed ID: 12952324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tomographic reconstruction for wide-field adaptive optics systems: Fourier domain analysis and fundamental limitations.
    Neichel B; Fusco T; Conan JM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2009 Jan; 26(1):219-35. PubMed ID: 19109619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of sodium laser guide star fratricide on multi-conjugate adaptive optics systems.
    Wang L; Otarola A; Ellerbroek B
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A19-28. PubMed ID: 21045880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.