These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22885998)
1. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task. Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task. Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations. Mathew H; Kunde W; Herbort O Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1397-1409. PubMed ID: 28233050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors. Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):513-21. PubMed ID: 24095853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning. Hughes CM; Seegelke C J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 24006878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task. Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of time constraints on posture choices during an end-state comfort task. Modersitzki R; Studenka BE Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Jun; 71():102618. PubMed ID: 32452435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing. Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Schack T J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 22551086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing planning of a familiar grasp to an object: what it is to pick a cup. Rounis E; Zhang Z; Pizzamiglio G; Duta M; Humphreys G Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1281-1296. PubMed ID: 28204861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of action possibility and end-state comfort on motor imagery of manual action sequences. Seegelke C; Hughes CM Brain Cogn; 2015 Dec; 101():12-6. PubMed ID: 26544603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations. Herbort O Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():100-16. PubMed ID: 26004123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limits of end-state planning. Hermens F; Kral D; Rosenbaum DA Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():148-62. PubMed ID: 24531145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals. Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Spiegel MA; Oehmichen C; Hammes J; Schack T PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43015. PubMed ID: 22970119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation. Cohen RG; Rosenbaum DA Psychol Res; 2011 Jul; 75(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20941504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction. Zhang W; Rosenbaum DA Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 17763845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible constraint hierarchy during the visual encoding of tool-object interactions. Bayani KYT; Natraj N; Gale MK; Temples D; Atawala N; Wheaton LA Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 54(7):6520-6532. PubMed ID: 34523764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]