These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22886736)

  • 1. The exemplar interleaving effect in inductive learning: moderation by the difficulty of category discriminations.
    Zulkiply N; Burt JS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 22886736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: the roles of discrimination and retrieval.
    Birnbaum MS; Kornell N; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 23138567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging.
    Wahlheim CN; Dunlosky J; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):750-63. PubMed ID: 21264639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 18578849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The benefit of interleaved presentation in category learning is independent of working memory.
    Wang J; Liu Z; Xing Q; Seger CA
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 31900048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions: A priori theories, fluency effects, and misattributions of the interleaving benefit.
    Yan VX; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jul; 145(7):918-33. PubMed ID: 27227415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spacing as the friend of both memory and induction in young and older adults.
    Kornell N; Castel AD; Eich TS; Bjork RA
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Jun; 25(2):498-503. PubMed ID: 20545435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of training sequence and between-category similarity on unsupervised induction.
    Clapper JP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1370-90. PubMed ID: 25384115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How should exemplars be sequenced in inductive learning? Empirical evidence versus learners' opinions.
    Yan VX; Soderstrom NC; Seneviratna GS; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):403-416. PubMed ID: 28816472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How many exemplars are used? Explorations with the Rex Leopold I model.
    De Schryver M; Vandist K; Rosseel Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 19293104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interleaving Effects in Blindfolded Perceptual Learning Across Various Sensory Modalities.
    Abel R
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Apr; 47(4):e13270. PubMed ID: 37029510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is spacing really the "friend of induction"?
    Verkoeijen PP; Bouwmeester S
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():259. PubMed ID: 24744742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development of category-based induction: reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition (ITR) paradigm.
    Hayes BK; McKinnon R; Sweller N
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1430-41. PubMed ID: 18793074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning mode and exemplar sequencing in unsupervised category learning.
    Zeithamova D; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):731-741. PubMed ID: 19379046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Category generalization in a new context: the role of visual attention.
    Goldenberg ER; Johnson SP
    Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Feb; 38():49-56. PubMed ID: 25601082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equal spacing and expanding schedules in children's categorization and generalization.
    Vlach HA; Sandhofer CM; Bjork RA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jul; 123():129-37. PubMed ID: 24613074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing.
    Mitchell C; Nash S; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):237-42. PubMed ID: 18194066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus range and discontinuity effects on information-integration category learning and generalization.
    Maddox WT; Filoteo JV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1279-95. PubMed ID: 21327747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal sequencing during category learning: Testing a dual-learning systems perspective.
    Noh SM; Yan VX; Bjork RA; Maddox WT
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():23-29. PubMed ID: 27343480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.