These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2288685)
21. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration. Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study. Naeselius K; Arnelund CF; Molin MK Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18350945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Correlation of topography to bond strength of etched ceramic. Jardel V; Degrange M; Picard B; Derrien G Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 10196829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of lased enamel and dentin on marginal seal of bonded ceramic inlays. Mohamed AF Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1321-5. PubMed ID: 9497676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Otto T; De Nisco S Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [New horizons in esthetics thanks to new materials. Inlays, onlays and ceramic veneers]. Jinoian V Inf Dent; 1988 Mar; 70(9):671-8. PubMed ID: 3073143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Krämer N; Frankenberger R Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Copy milling ceramic inlays from resin analogs: a practicable approach with the CELAY system. Eidenbenz S; Lehner CR; Schärer P Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 8003193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Ceramic inlays for posterior dental restoration. Preliminary report of 3 years clinical experience]. Moncada GA; Garrido A Rev Dent Chile; 1988 Sep; 79(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 3076691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Remakes of Colorlogic and IPS Empress ceramic restorations in general practice. Hekland H; Riise T; Berg E Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 14714841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Bonded ceramic inlay-onlays. 1]. de Rouffignac M; de Cooman J Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1988 Dec; 42(164):811-34. PubMed ID: 3077592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]