These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Microleakage of several tooth-colored restorative materials in cervical cavities. A comparative study in vitro. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Stark MM Dent Mater; 1986 Oct; 2(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 3542663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of microleakage between direct placement composites and direct composite inlays. Scherer W; Caliskan F; Kaim J; Moss S; Vijayaraghavan T Gen Dent; 1990; 38(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 2197172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of microleakage below cemento-enamel junction using light cure and chemically cured glass ionomer cement liners. Gupta S; Khinda VI; Grewal N J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Dec; 20(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 12587752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. Payne JH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling. Futatsuki M; Nakata M J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous activation technique: an alternative for bonding composite resin to glass ionomer. Pinheiro SL; Oda M; Matson E; Duarte DA; Guedes-Pinto AC Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 12889705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique. Yap AU; Mok BY; Pearson G J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 9131479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations. Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice. Cannon ML J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations. Ferrari M; Davidson CL Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Survey of Baseline and Ful-fil restorations]. Cianconi L; Baggi L; Mangani F Attual Dent; 1990 Nov-4; 6(38):49-54. PubMed ID: 2288692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of a posterior composite resin lined with glass ionomer. Garcia-Godoy F Gen Dent; 1988; 36(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 3271735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of four composite resins over a glass ionomer cement base in Class V restorations. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg KB; Bogdan MS Quintessence Int; 1985 Dec; 16(12):817-20. PubMed ID: 3868783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]