184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22887768)
1. Microfabricated nanotopological surfaces for study of adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity.
Chen W; Sun Y; Fu J
Small; 2013 Jan; 9(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 22887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modulating cell adhesion dynamics on carbon nanotube monolayer engineered with extracellular matrix proteins.
Cai N; Wong CC; Gong YX; Tan SC; Chan V; Liao K
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2010 Apr; 2(4):1038-47. PubMed ID: 20423124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Engineering cellular response using nanopatterned bulk metallic glass.
Padmanabhan J; Kinser ER; Stalter MA; Duncan-Lewis C; Balestrini JL; Sawyer AJ; Schroers J; Kyriakides TR
ACS Nano; 2014 May; 8(5):4366-75. PubMed ID: 24724817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nanoscale topography reduces fibroblast growth, focal adhesion size and migration-related gene expression on platinum surfaces.
Pennisi CP; Dolatshahi-Pirouz A; Foss M; Chevallier J; Fink T; Zachar V; Besenbacher F; Yoshida K
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2011 Jul; 85(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 21435850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells.
Chen W; Villa-Diaz LG; Sun Y; Weng S; Kim JK; Lam RH; Han L; Fan R; Krebsbach PH; Fu J
ACS Nano; 2012 May; 6(5):4094-103. PubMed ID: 22486594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The fibroblast response to tubes exhibiting internal nanotopography.
Berry CC; Dalby MJ; McCloy D; Affrossman S
Biomaterials; 2005 Aug; 26(24):4985-92. PubMed ID: 15769534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function.
Bettinger CJ; Langer R; Borenstein JT
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2009; 48(30):5406-15. PubMed ID: 19492373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biocompatibility of cluster-assembled nanostructured TiO2 with primary and cancer cells.
Carbone R; Marangi I; Zanardi A; Giorgetti L; Chierici E; Berlanda G; Podestà A; Fiorentini F; Bongiorno G; Piseri P; Pelicci PG; Milani P
Biomaterials; 2006 Jun; 27(17):3221-9. PubMed ID: 16504283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic cell adhesion and migration on nanoscale grooved substrates.
Lamers E; te Riet J; Domanski M; Luttge R; Figdor CG; Gardeniers JG; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Eur Cell Mater; 2012 Mar; 23():182-93; discussion 193-4. PubMed ID: 22415804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nanotopography: cellular responses to nanostructured materials.
Kriparamanan R; Aswath P; Zhou A; Tang L; Nguyen KT
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2006 Jul; 6(7):1905-19. PubMed ID: 17025103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shear force at the cell-matrix interface: enhanced analysis for microfabricated post array detectors.
Lemmon CA; Sniadecki NJ; Ruiz SA; Tan JL; Romer LH; Chen CS
Mech Chem Biosyst; 2005; 2(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 16708468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Live-cell subcellular measurement of cell stiffness using a microengineered stretchable micropost array membrane.
Lam RH; Weng S; Lu W; Fu J
Integr Biol (Camb); 2012 Oct; 4(10):1289-98. PubMed ID: 22935822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of nanotopography for biomaterials on cell behaviors].
Meng J; Zhu G; Xu H
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 24(3):685-9. PubMed ID: 17713289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanosensitivity of fibroblast cell shape and movement to anisotropic substratum topography gradients.
Kim DH; Han K; Gupta K; Kwon KW; Suh KY; Levchenko A
Biomaterials; 2009 Oct; 30(29):5433-44. PubMed ID: 19595452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Synergistic regulation of cell function by matrix rigidity and adhesive pattern.
Weng S; Fu J
Biomaterials; 2011 Dec; 32(36):9584-93. PubMed ID: 21955687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nanotopographic surfaces with defined surface chemistries from amyloid fibril networks can control cell attachment.
Reynolds NP; Styan KE; Easton CD; Li Y; Waddington L; Lara C; Forsythe JS; Mezzenga R; Hartley PG; Muir BW
Biomacromolecules; 2013 Jul; 14(7):2305-16. PubMed ID: 23701412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative Control of Protein and Cell Interaction with Nanostructured Surfaces by Cluster Assembling.
Schulte C; Podestà A; Lenardi C; Tedeschi G; Milani P
Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 28116907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adhesion and proliferation of fibroblasts on cluster-assembled nanostructured carbon films: the role of surface morphology.
Lenardi C; Perego C; Cassina V; Podestà A; D'Amico A; Gualandris D; Vinati S; Fiorentini F; Bongiorno G; Piserj P; Vellea Sacchi F; Milani P
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2006 Dec; 6(12):3718-30. PubMed ID: 17256321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Degradable block polyurethanes from nontoxic building blocks as scaffold materials to support cell growth and proliferation.
Rechichi A; Ciardelli G; D'Acunto M; Vozzi G; Giusti P
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Mar; 84(4):847-55. PubMed ID: 17635022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Poly(vinyl alcohol)/halloysite nanotubes bionanocomposite films: Properties and in vitro osteoblasts and fibroblasts response.
Zhou WY; Guo B; Liu M; Liao R; Rabie AB; Jia D
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jun; 93(4):1574-87. PubMed ID: 20014291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
