BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22889565)

  • 1. [Cone Beam computerized tomography and implants].
    Cavézian R; Pasquet G
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2012 Sep; 113(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 22889565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metal artifacts from posterior mandibular implants as seen in CBCT.
    Naitoh M; Saburi K; Gotoh K; Kurita K; Ariji E
    Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 23399788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible.
    Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA
    N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
    Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
    Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital replacement of the distorted dentition acquired by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a pilot study.
    Nairn NJ; Ayoub AF; Barbenel J; Moos K; Naudi K; Ju X; Khambay BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1488-93. PubMed ID: 23644040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters.
    Pauwels R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):156-61. PubMed ID: 25805884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study.
    Katsumata A; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Naitoh M; Fujishita M; Ariji E; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 18715805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone beam computerized tomography: basics for digital planning in oral surgery and implantology.
    Rugani P; Kirnbauer B; Arnetzl GV; Jakse N
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 19413269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
    Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Dental Implant Patient.
    Klokkevold PR
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):521-30. PubMed ID: 26820009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants.
    Schulze RK; Berndt D; d'Hoedt B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 19845706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery.
    Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
    Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro.
    Sur J; Seki K; Koizumi H; Nakajima K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):e29-33. PubMed ID: 20598589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):707-30, v. PubMed ID: 18805225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.