These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22889591)
1. Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for TAVR assessment in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves: comparison with computed tomography. Quail MA; Nordmeyer J; Schievano S; Reinthaler M; Mullen MJ; Taylor AM Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3912-7. PubMed ID: 22889591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Non-Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Computed Tomography Angiography for Aortic Annular Sizing Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Wang J; Jagasia DH; Kondapally YR; Herrmann HC; Han Y J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 29(7):239-245. PubMed ID: 28570260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR. Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography to Guide Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized, Open-Label, Noninferiority Trial. Reindl M; Lechner I; Holzknecht M; Tiller C; Fink P; Oberhollenzer F; von der Emde S; Pamminger M; Troger F; Kremser C; Laßnig E; Danninger K; Binder RK; Ulmer H; Brenner C; Klug G; Bauer A; Metzler B; Mayr A; Reinstadler SJ Circulation; 2023 Oct; 148(16):1220-1230. PubMed ID: 37634187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided aortic valve replacement using Engager valve. Kindzelski BA; Li M; Mazilu D; Hunt T; Horvath KA Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 98(6):2194-9. PubMed ID: 25468087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Prior Aortic Root Surgery: Insights From Virtual Modeling. Brener MI; Yamabe T; Leb J; Khalique OK; Takayama H; George I Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009539. PubMed ID: 33131300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement: study protocol for a randomized trial (TAVR-CMR). Klug G; Reinstadler S; Troger F; Holzknecht M; Reindl M; Tiller C; Lechner I; Fink P; Pamminger M; Kremser C; Ulmer H; Bauer A; Metzler B; Mayr A Trials; 2022 Sep; 23(1):726. PubMed ID: 36056444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is MRI equivalent to CT in the guidance of TAVR? A pilot study. Mayr A; Klug G; Reinstadler SJ; Feistritzer HJ; Reindl M; Kremser C; Kranewitter C; Bonaros N; Friedrich G; Feuchtner G; Metzler B Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4625-4634. PubMed ID: 29736853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D echocardiographic analysis of aortic annulus for transcatheter aortic valve replacement using novel aortic valve quantification software: Comparison with computed tomography. Mediratta A; Addetia K; Medvedofsky D; Schneider RJ; Kruse E; Shah AP; Nathan S; Paul JD; Blair JE; Ota T; Balkhy HH; Patel AR; Mor-Avi V; Lang RM Echocardiography; 2017 May; 34(5):690-699. PubMed ID: 28345211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal pre-TAVR annulus sizing in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: area-derived perimeter by CT is the best-correlated measure with intraoperative sizing. Wang Y; Wang M; Song G; Wang W; Lv B; Wang H; Wu Y Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):259-269. PubMed ID: 29926206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Koos R; Altiok E; Mahnken AH; Neizel M; Dohmen G; Marx N; Kühl H; Hoffmann R Int J Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 158(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 21315460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary ostial eccentricity in severe aortic stenosis: Guidance for BASILICA transcatheter leaflet laceration. Komatsu I; Leipsic J; Webb JG; Blanke P; Mackensen GB; Don CW; McCabe JM; Rumer C; Tan CW; Levin DB; Ramos M; Aldea GS; Reisman M; Wijeysundera HC; Radhakrishnan S; Sathananthan J; Piazza N; Kornowski R; Dvir D J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(6):516-519. PubMed ID: 32199758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of accuracy of aortic root annulus assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance versus echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pontone G; Andreini D; Bartorelli AL; Bertella E; Mushtaq S; Gripari P; Loguercio M; Cortinovis S; Baggiano A; Conte E; Beltrama V; Annoni A; Formenti A; Tamborini G; Muratori M; Guaricci A; Alamanni F; Ballerini G; Pepi M Am J Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 112(11):1790-9. PubMed ID: 24045059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]