BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22890477)

  • 1. Remote evaluation of laparoscopic performance using the global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills.
    Choy I; Fecso A; Kwong J; Jackson T; Okrainec A
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Feb; 27(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 22890477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills.
    Vassiliou MC; Feldman LS; Andrew CG; Bergman S; Leffondré K; Stanbridge D; Fried GM
    Am J Surg; 2005 Jul; 190(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15972181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of surgical performance during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a multicenter study.
    Ghaderi I; Vaillancourt M; Sroka G; Kaneva PA; Vassiliou MC; Choy I; Okrainec A; Seagull FJ; Sutton E; George I; Park A; Brintzenhoff R; Stefanidis D; Fried GM; Feldman LS
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Aug; 25(8):2555-63. PubMed ID: 21359893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and reliability of global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) in novice trainees performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Kramp KH; van Det MJ; Hoff C; Lamme B; Veeger NJ; Pierie JP
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 25441259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error rating tool to identify and analyse technical errors and events in laparoscopic surgery.
    Bonrath EM; Zevin B; Dedy NJ; Grantcharov TP
    Br J Surg; 2013 Jul; 100(8):1080-8. PubMed ID: 23754649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Surgical Competence: Development and Validation of Rating Scales Used for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy.
    Goderstad JM; Sandvik L; Fosse E; Lieng M
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):600-8. PubMed ID: 26966082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale.
    Larsen CR; Grantcharov T; Schouenborg L; Ottosen C; Soerensen JL; Ottesen B
    BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):908-16. PubMed ID: 18485171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A laparoscopic surgical skills assessment tool for veterinarians.
    Fransson BA; Ragle CA; Bryan ME
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(3):304-13. PubMed ID: 20847341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room.
    Kundhal PS; Grantcharov TP
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Mar; 23(3):645-9. PubMed ID: 18622548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward feasible, valid, and reliable video-based assessments of technical surgical skills in the operating room.
    Aggarwal R; Grantcharov T; Moorthy K; Milland T; Darzi A
    Ann Surg; 2008 Feb; 247(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 18216547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating intraoperative laparoscopic skill: direct observation versus blinded videotaped performances.
    Vassiliou MC; Feldman LS; Fraser SA; Charlebois P; Chaudhury P; Stanbridge DD; Fried GM
    Surg Innov; 2007 Sep; 14(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 17928621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training model for laparoscopic Heller and Dor fundoplication: a tool for laparoscopic skills training and assessment-construct validity using the GOALS score.
    Bellorin O; Kundel A; Sharma S; Ramirez-Valderrama A; Lee P
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3654-60. PubMed ID: 26514134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Palter VN; Grantcharov TP
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Sep; 26(9):2489-503. PubMed ID: 22476826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills.
    Gumbs AA; Hogle NJ; Fowler DL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Feb; 204(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 17254935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of remote administration of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) skills test using Google wearable device.
    Nikouline A; Jimenez MC; Okrainec A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):443-449. PubMed ID: 31037339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliable assessment of laparoscopic performance in the operating room using videotape analysis.
    Chang L; Hogle NJ; Moore BB; Graham MJ; Sinanan MN; Bailey R; Fowler DL
    Surg Innov; 2007 Jun; 14(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 17558018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical and technological skills assessment in laparoscopic surgery.
    Sarker SK; Chang A; Vincent C
    JSLS; 2006; 10(3):284-92. PubMed ID: 17212881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective randomized controlled blinded study to evaluate the effect of short-term focused training program in laparoscopy on operating room performance of surgery residents (CTRI /2012/11/003113).
    Bansal VK; Raveendran R; Misra MC; Bhattacharjee H; Rajan K; Krishna A; Kumar P; Kumar S
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 24411424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Deal SB; Stefanidis D; Telem D; Fanelli RD; McDonald M; Ujiki M; Michael Brunt L; Alseidi AA
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5094-5100. PubMed ID: 28444497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of a laparoscopic hysterectomy cuff closure simulation model for surgical training.
    Tunitsky-Bitton E; Propst K; Muffly T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):392.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26640072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.