260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22891070)
1. The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.
Shafiro V; Sheft S; Gygi B; Ho KT
Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):83-101. PubMed ID: 22891070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.
Shafiro V; Gygi B; Cheng MY; Vachhani J; Mulvey M
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 21248643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.
Loebach JL; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1126-39. PubMed ID: 18247913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Moore AN
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing live to recorded speech in training the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech.
Faulkner A; Rosen S; Green T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL336-42. PubMed ID: 23039574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.
Shafiro V; Sheft S; Kuvadia S; Gygi B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):509-19. PubMed ID: 25633579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.
Li T; Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 20868733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
Başkent D; Chatterjee M
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.
Nogaki G; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17496666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.
Rosen S; Zhang Y; Speers K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL318-23. PubMed ID: 26428833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.
Warnecke M; Litovsky RY
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15117. PubMed ID: 34302032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
