These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22891572)

  • 21. On the robustness of overall F0-only modifications to the perception of emotions in speech.
    Bulut M; Narayanan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4547-58. PubMed ID: 18537403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sex differences in brain control of prosody.
    Rymarczyk K; Grabowska A
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):921-30. PubMed ID: 17005213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Psychoacoustic studies on the processing of vocal interjections: how to disentangle lexical and prosodic information?
    Dietrich S; Ackermann H; Szameitat DP; Alter K
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():295-302. PubMed ID: 17015087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
    Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of affective prosody by young and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 20230124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distinct frontal regions subserve evaluation of linguistic and emotional aspects of speech intonation.
    Wildgruber D; Hertrich I; Riecker A; Erb M; Anders S; Grodd W; Ackermann H
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Dec; 14(12):1384-9. PubMed ID: 15217896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Lateralization characteristics in the perception of speech in noise by children of different age groups].
    Zaĭtseva KA; Dmitrieva ES; Miroshnikov DB
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1995; 31(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 7483917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emotional speech acoustic model for Malay: iterative versus isolated unit training.
    Mustafa MB; Ainon RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3057-66. PubMed ID: 24116440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How aging affects the recognition of emotional speech.
    Paulmann S; Pell MD; Kotz SA
    Brain Lang; 2008 Mar; 104(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 17428529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Context-conditioned generalization in adaptation to distorted speech.
    Dahan D; Mead RL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):704-28. PubMed ID: 20515199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Functional contributions of the basal ganglia to emotional prosody: evidence from ERPs.
    Paulmann S; Pell MD; Kotz SA
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1217():171-8. PubMed ID: 18501336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech recognition and working memory capacity in young-elderly listeners: effects of hearing sensitivity.
    Cervera TC; Soler MJ; Dasi C; Ruiz JC
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 19739905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Emotion words are remembered better in the left ear.
    Sim TC; Martinez C
    Laterality; 2005 Mar; 10(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 15849031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contribution of a contralateral hearing aid to perception of consonant voicing, intonation, and emotional state in adult cochlear implantees.
    Most T; Gaon-Sivan G; Shpak T; Luntz M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):244-58. PubMed ID: 22057984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. You are only as old as you sound: auditory aftereffects in vocal age perception.
    Zäske R; Schweinberger SR
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):283-8. PubMed ID: 21771649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.