206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22891625)
1. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM
Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.
Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE
Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT.
Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is it worth using low-cost glass ionomer cements for occlusal ART restorations in primary molars? 2-year survival and cost analysis of a Randomized clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Ladewig NM; Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JCP; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103446. PubMed ID: 32758684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Hesse D; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC; Raggio DP
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 30171345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilayer technique and nano-filled coating increase success of approximal ART restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Bönecker M; van Amerongen WE; Raggio DP
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 May; 26(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 26370224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.
Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-year survival of glass ionomer sealants placed as part of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE
East Afr Med J; 2010 Sep; 87(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 23457815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations.
da Franca C; Colares V; Van Amerongen E
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jul; 21(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21401749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up.
Deepa G; Shobha T
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya G
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 19995507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Nov; 19(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 19732191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: the operator effect.
Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Van Loveren C; Van Amerongen WE; Raggio DP
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 May; 18(3):e529-32. PubMed ID: 23524424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
