BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22891626)

  • 1. A non-B DNA can replace heptamer of V(D)J recombination when present along with a nonamer: implications in chromosomal translocations and cancer.
    Nishana M; Raghavan SC
    Biochem J; 2012 Nov; 448(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 22891626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential reaction kinetics, cleavage complex formation, and nonamer binding domain dependence dictate the structure-specific and sequence-specific nuclease activity of RAGs.
    Naik AK; Raghavan SC
    J Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 415(3):475-88. PubMed ID: 22119487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synergistic requirement of orphan nonamer-like elements and DNA bending enhanced by HMGB1 for RAG-mediated nicking at cryptic 12-RSS but not authentic 12-RSS.
    Numata M; Nagata K
    Genes Cells; 2011 Aug; 16(8):879-95. PubMed ID: 21740486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structure-specific nuclease activity of RAGs is modulated by sequence, length and phase position of flanking double-stranded DNA.
    Kumari R; Raghavan SC
    FEBS J; 2015 Jan; 282(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 25327637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The DDE motif in RAG-1 is contributed in trans to a single active site that catalyzes the nicking and transesterification steps of V(D)J recombination.
    Swanson PC
    Mol Cell Biol; 2001 Jan; 21(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 11134333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double-strand break formation by the RAG complex at the bcl-2 major breakpoint region and at other non-B DNA structures in vitro.
    Raghavan SC; Swanson PC; Ma Y; Lieber MR
    Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Jul; 25(14):5904-19. PubMed ID: 15988007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Znc2 module of RAG1 contributes towards structure-specific nuclease activity of RAGs.
    Nilavar NM; Nishana M; Paranjape AM; Mahadeva R; Kumari R; Choudhary B; Raghavan SC
    Biochem J; 2020 Sep; 477(18):3567-3582. PubMed ID: 32886094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural gymnastics of RAG-mediated DNA cleavage in V(D)J recombination.
    Ru H; Zhang P; Wu H
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Dec; 53():178-186. PubMed ID: 30476719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RAG-2 promotes heptamer occupancy by RAG-1 in the assembly of a V(D)J initiation complex.
    Swanson PC; Desiderio S
    Mol Cell Biol; 1999 May; 19(5):3674-83. PubMed ID: 10207091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the V(D)J recombination efficiency at lymphoid chromosomal translocation breakpoints.
    Raghavan SC; Kirsch IR; Lieber MR
    J Biol Chem; 2001 Aug; 276(31):29126-33. PubMed ID: 11390401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.
    Paranjape AM; Desai SS; Nishana M; Roy U; Nilavar NM; Mondal A; Kumari R; Radha G; Katapadi VK; Choudhary B; Raghavan SC
    PLoS Genet; 2022 Oct; 18(10):e1010421. PubMed ID: 36228010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biochemical Characterization of Nonamer Binding Domain of RAG1 Reveals its Thymine Preference with Respect to Length and Position.
    Raveendran D; Raghavan SC
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():19091. PubMed ID: 26742581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A non-B-DNA structure at the Bcl-2 major breakpoint region is cleaved by the RAG complex.
    Raghavan SC; Swanson PC; Wu X; Hsieh CL; Lieber MR
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):88-93. PubMed ID: 14999286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The structure-specific nicking of small heteroduplexes by the RAG complex: implications for lymphoid chromosomal translocations.
    Raghavan SC; Gu J; Swanson PC; Lieber MR
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jun; 6(6):751-9. PubMed ID: 17307402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time analysis of RAG complex activity in V(D)J recombination.
    Zagelbaum J; Shimazaki N; Esguerra ZA; Watanabe G; Lieber MR; Rothenberg E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Oct; 113(42):11853-11858. PubMed ID: 27702897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Involvement of illegitimate V(D)J recombination or microhomology-mediated nonhomologous end-joining in the formation of intragenic deletions of the Notch1 gene in mouse thymic lymphomas.
    Tsuji H; Ishii-Ohba H; Katsube T; Ukai H; Aizawa S; Doi M; Hioki K; Ogiu T
    Cancer Res; 2004 Dec; 64(24):8882-90. PubMed ID: 15604248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recruitment of RAG1 and RAG2 to Chromatinized DNA during V(D)J Recombination.
    Shetty K; Schatz DG
    Mol Cell Biol; 2015 Nov; 35(21):3701-13. PubMed ID: 26303526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HMGB1/2 can target DNA for illegitimate cleavage by the RAG1/2 complex.
    Zhang M; Swanson PC
    BMC Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 10():24. PubMed ID: 19317908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct roles of RAG1 and RAG2 in binding the V(D)J recombination signal sequences.
    Akamatsu Y; Oettinger MA
    Mol Cell Biol; 1998 Aug; 18(8):4670-8. PubMed ID: 9671477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. V(D)J recombination moves in vitro.
    Schatz DG
    Semin Immunol; 1997 Jun; 9(3):149-59. PubMed ID: 9200326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.