These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22891857)

  • 1. Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.
    Marsh EJ; Fazio LK; Goswick AE
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):899-906. PubMed ID: 22891857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests.
    Fazio LK; Agarwal PK; Marsh EJ; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 20516221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.
    Butler AC; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 18491500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests.
    Smith MA; Karpicke JD
    Memory; 2014; 22(7):784-802. PubMed ID: 24059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.
    Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test.
    Marsh EJ; Lozito JP; Umanath S; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Memory; 2012; 20(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 22640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How "none of the above" (NOTA) affects the accessibility of tested and related information in multiple-choice questions.
    Blendermann MF; Little JL; Gray KM
    Memory; 2020 Apr; 28(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 32106781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing.
    Marsh EJ; Roediger HL; Bjork RA; Bjork EL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Apr; 14(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 17694900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.
    Roediger HL; Marsh EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1155-9. PubMed ID: 16248758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed, but not immediate, feedback after multiple-choice questions increases performance on a subsequent short-answer, but not multiple-choice, exam: evidence for the dual-process theory of memory.
    Sinha N; Glass AL
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(2):118-34. PubMed ID: 25832741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD
    Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Type of Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing on Long-Term Retention.
    Jang Y; Marshall E
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):107-119. PubMed ID: 29547068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children.
    Lipowski SL; Pyc MA; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Apr; 50(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 24294884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting.
    Little JL; Bjork EL; Bjork RA; Angello G
    Psychol Sci; 2012; 23(11):1337-44. PubMed ID: 23034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge.
    Cantor AD; Eslick AN; Marsh EJ; Bjork RA; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 25201690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes.
    McDermott KB; Agarwal PK; D'Antonio L; Roediger HL; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Mar; 20(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 24274234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25123774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of elaborate feedback during practice tests: Costs and benefits of retrieval prompts.
    van den Broek GSE; Segers E; van Rijn H; Takashima A; Verhoeven L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 30998028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond hypercorrection: remembering corrective feedback for low-confidence errors.
    Griffiths L; Higham PA
    Memory; 2018 Feb; 26(2):201-218. PubMed ID: 28671026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-enhanced learning in medical education.
    Larsen DP; Butler AC; Roediger HL
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 18823514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.