BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22891868)

  • 21. Dual-opposite injection electrokinetic chromatography for the unbiased, simultaneous separation of cationic and anionic compounds.
    Durkin D; Foley JP
    Electrophoresis; 2000 Jun; 21(10):1997-2009. PubMed ID: 10879959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. pH Change in Electroosmotic Flow Hysteresis.
    Lim CY; Lim AE; Lam YC
    Anal Chem; 2017 Sep; 89(17):9394-9399. PubMed ID: 28737036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Field-effect flow control in a polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic system.
    Buch JS; Wang PC; DeVoe DL; Lee CS
    Electrophoresis; 2001 Oct; 22(18):3902-7. PubMed ID: 11700719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Separation of inorganic and small organic anions by CE using phosphonium-based mono- and dicationic reagents.
    Krízek T; Breitbach ZS; Armstrong DW; Tesarová E; Coufal P
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Nov; 30(22):3955-63. PubMed ID: 19847805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electric field gradient focusing with electro-osmotic flow to reduce analyte dispersion: Concept and numerical investigation.
    De Moor T; Lagae L; Van Hoof C; Liu C; Van Roy W
    J Chromatogr A; 2023 Jan; 1689():463726. PubMed ID: 36586281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Manipulating particles in microfluidics by floating electrodes.
    Yalcin SE; Sharma A; Qian S; Joo SW; Baysal O
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Nov; 31(22):3711-8. PubMed ID: 20945412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analyte transport past a nanofluidic intermediate electrode junction in a microfluidic device.
    Mao X; Reschke BR; Timperman AT
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Aug; 31(15):2686-94. PubMed ID: 20665927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microfabrication of a tapered channel for isoelectric focusing with thermally generated pH gradient.
    Huang T; Pawliszyn J
    Electrophoresis; 2002 Oct; 23(20):3504-10. PubMed ID: 12412118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Finite sample effect in temperature gradient focusing.
    Lin H; Shackman JG; Ross D
    Lab Chip; 2008 Jun; 8(6):969-78. PubMed ID: 18497919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A quantitative model to evaluate the ion-enrichment and ion-depletion effect at microchannel-nanochannel junctions.
    Li G; Wang S; Byun CK; Wang X; Liu S
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Sep; 650(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 19720195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 100,000-fold concentration of anions in capillary zone electrophoresis using electroosmotic flow controlled counterflow isotachophoretic stacking under field amplified conditions.
    Breadmore MC; Quirino JP
    Anal Chem; 2008 Aug; 80(16):6373-81. PubMed ID: 18627177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electroosmotic Flow Hysteresis for Dissimilar Anionic Solutions.
    Lim AE; Lim CY; Lam YC
    Anal Chem; 2016 Aug; 88(16):8064-73. PubMed ID: 27426052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A chemometric approach for the elucidation of the parameter impact in the hyphenation of field-enhanced sample injection and sweeping in capillary electrophoresis.
    Anres P; Delaunay N; Vial J; Gareil P
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Apr; 33(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 22539320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamically formed admicelle layer to control the amplitude of cathodic electroosmotic flow.
    Erny GL; Gonçalves BM; Esteves VI
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Sep; 1256():271-5. PubMed ID: 22901301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electroosmotic flow in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannels.
    Bao N; Xu JJ; Zhang Q; Hang JL; Chen HY
    J Chromatogr A; 2005 Dec; 1099(1-2):203-6. PubMed ID: 16303131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Numerical studies of electrokinetic control of DNA concentration in a closed-end microchannel.
    Daghighi Y; Li D
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Mar; 31(5):868-78. PubMed ID: 20191548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temperature gradient focusing with field-amplified continuous sample injection for dual-stage analyte enrichment and separation.
    Munson MS; Danger G; Shackman JG; Ross D
    Anal Chem; 2007 Aug; 79(16):6201-7. PubMed ID: 17616169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of varying electroosmotic flow on the effective diffusion in electric field gradient separations.
    Maynes D; Tenny J; Webbd BW; Lee ML
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Feb; 29(3):549-60. PubMed ID: 18200632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Redox modulation of electroosmotic flow in a carbon nanotube membrane.
    Miller SA; Martin CR
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 May; 126(20):6226-7. PubMed ID: 15149208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. One-step concentration of analytes based on dynamic change in pH in capillary zone electrophoresis.
    Wei W; Xue G; Yeung ES
    Anal Chem; 2002 Mar; 74(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 11924995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.