933 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22892148)
1. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases.
Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Galletti JD; Minguez N; Delrivo M; Fuentes Bonthoux F; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification.
Smadja D; Touboul D; Cohen A; Doveh E; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 156(2):237-246.e1. PubMed ID: 23746611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
Bühren J; Schäffeler T; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24360499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles.
Bühren J; Kook D; Yoon G; Kohnen T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3424-32. PubMed ID: 20164452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Topographic, elevation, and keratoconus indices for diagnosis of keratoconus by a combined Placido and Scheimpflug topography system.
Gharieb HM; Othman IS; Oreaba AH; Abdelatif MK
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1553-1562. PubMed ID: 33550850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system.
Montalbán R; Alió JL; Javaloy J; Piñero DP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 23218818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido topography.
Savini G; Barboni P; Carbonelli M; Hoffer KJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1809-16. PubMed ID: 21852068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of corneal volume from anterior topography and topographic pachymetry: application to healthy and keratoconic eyes.
Cerviño A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Ferrer-Blasco T; Garcia-Resua C; Montes-Mico R; Parafita M
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):652-60. PubMed ID: 19821928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus.
Kovács I; Miháltz K; Kránitz K; Juhász É; Takács Á; Dienes L; Gergely R; Nagy ZZ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 42(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 27026453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analysis on the role of Sirius combined topography and tomography system in screening for suspect keratoconus].
Zhang Y; Chen YG; Yang HY; Xia YJ; Zhao R
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 54(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 29429285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus.
de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus.
Piñero DP; Alió JL; Alesón A; Escaf Vergara M; Miranda M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):814-25. PubMed ID: 20457375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Pentacam and Orbscan IIz on posterior curvature topography measurements in keratoconus eyes.
Quisling S; Sjoberg S; Zimmerman B; Goins K; Sutphin J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1629-32. PubMed ID: 16949447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of corneal topography, pachymetry and higher order aberrations for detecting subclinical keratoconus.
Kandel S; Chaudhary M; Mishra SK; Joshi ND; Subedi M; Puri PR; Gyawali P; Bist J; Kandel H
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 May; 42(3):594-608. PubMed ID: 35147226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of axial and tangential corneal topography maps in detecting subclinical keratoconus.
Tummanapalli SS; Potluri H; Vaddavalli PK; Sangwan VS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2205-14. PubMed ID: 26703297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
