These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22892174)

  • 1. Analysis of the production and transaction costs of forest carbon offset projects in the USA.
    Galik CS; Cooley DM; Baker JS
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():128-36. PubMed ID: 22892174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Production costs of biodiversity zones on field and forest margins: a case study in Finland.
    Miettinen A; Hyytiäinen K; Mäkinen A
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 103():122-32. PubMed ID: 22466707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transaction costs and community-based natural resource management in Nepal.
    Adhikari B; Lovett JC
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Jan; 78(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 16048737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing sequestered carbon in forest offset programs: balancing accounting stringency and participation.
    Wise L; Marland E; Marland G; Hoyle J; Kowalczyk T; Ruseva T; Colby J; Kinlaw T
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2019 Dec; 14(1):16. PubMed ID: 31797110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance.
    Bond-Lamberty B; Peckham SD; Ahl DE; Gower ST
    Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7166):89-92. PubMed ID: 17972883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trade-based carbon sequestration accounting.
    King DM
    Environ Manage; 2004 Apr; 33(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 15453408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additionality and permanence standards in California's Forest Offset Protocol: A review of project and program level implications.
    Ruseva T; Marland E; Szymanski C; Hoyle J; Marland G; Kowalczyk T
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 198(Pt 1):277-288. PubMed ID: 28477569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998.
    Fang J; Chen A; Peng C; Zhao S; Ci L
    Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5525):2320-2. PubMed ID: 11423660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tropical forest restoration in Costa Rica: the effect of several strategies on litter production, accumulation and decomposition].
    Celentano D; Zahawi RA; Finegan B; Casanoves F; Ostertag R; Cole RJ; Holl KD
    Rev Biol Trop; 2011 Sep; 59(3):1323-36. PubMed ID: 22017136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness and legitimacy of forest carbon standards in the OTC voluntary carbon market.
    Merger E; Pistorius T
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2011 Aug; 6(1):4. PubMed ID: 21849036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Small-scale forestry and carbon offset markets: An empirical study of Vermont Current Use forest landowner willingness to accept carbon credit programs.
    White AE; Lutz DA; Howarth RB; Soto JR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201967. PubMed ID: 30106977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.
    McKechnie J; Colombo S; Chen J; Mabee W; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):789-95. PubMed ID: 21142063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outsourcing and benchmarking in a rural public hospital: does economic theory provide the complete answer?
    Young SH
    Rural Remote Health; 2003; 3(1):124. PubMed ID: 15877485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling ozone effects on adult beech trees through simulation of defence, damage, and repair costs: Implementation of the CASIROZ ozone model in the ANAFORE forest model.
    Deckmyn G; Op de Beeck M; Löw M; Then C; Verbeeck H; Wipfler P; Ceulemans R
    Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2007 Mar; 9(2):320-30. PubMed ID: 17357024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biofuel plantations on forested lands: double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate.
    Danielsen F; Beukema H; Burgess ND; Parish F; Brühl CA; Donald PF; Murdiyarso D; Phalan B; Reijnders L; Struebig M; Fitzherbert EB
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):348-58. PubMed ID: 19040648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of rehabilitating logged rainforest for birds.
    Edwards DP; Ansell FA; Ahmad AH; Nilus R; Hamer KC
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1628-33. PubMed ID: 19775274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO(2) on forest trees and forest ecosystems: knowledge gaps.
    Karnosky DF
    Environ Int; 2003 Jun; 29(2-3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12676204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indicators of carbon storage in U.S. ecosystems: baseline for terrestrial carbon accounting.
    Negra C; Sweedo CC; Cavender-Bares K; O'Malley R
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(4):1376-82. PubMed ID: 18574168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Forest Management Strategy on Carbon Storage and Revenue in Western Washington: A Probabilistic Simulation of Tradeoffs.
    Fischer PW; Cullen AC; Ettl GJ
    Risk Anal; 2017 Jan; 37(1):173-192. PubMed ID: 27164046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.