These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22892358)

  • 1. Novel silica sol-gel passive sampler for mercury monitoring in aqueous systems.
    Zhou Y; Stotesbury T; Dimock B; Vreugdenhil A; Hintelmann H
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 22892358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring levels of mercury in contaminated river water.
    Aguilar-Martínez R; Gómez-Gómez MM; Greenwood R; Mills GA; Vrana B; Palacios-Corvillo MA
    Talanta; 2009 Feb; 77(4):1483-9. PubMed ID: 19084668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel passive water sampler for in situ sampling of antibiotics.
    Chen CE; Zhang H; Jones KC
    J Environ Monit; 2012 May; 14(6):1523-30. PubMed ID: 22538362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of sampler configuration on the uptake kinetics of a passive air sampler.
    Zhang X; Wong C; Lei YD; Wania F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(1):397-403. PubMed ID: 22103289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different types of diffusive gradient in thin film samplers for measurement of dissolved methylmercury in freshwaters.
    Fernández-Gómez C; Bayona JM; Díez S
    Talanta; 2014 Nov; 129():486-90. PubMed ID: 25127623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the DGT technique for Hg measurement in water: comparison of three different types of samplers in laboratory assays.
    Fernández-Gómez C; Dimock B; Hintelmann H; Díez S
    Chemosphere; 2011 Nov; 85(9):1452-7. PubMed ID: 21925697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements of dissolved methylmercury in natural waters using diffusive gradients in thin film (DGT).
    Clarisse O; Hintelmann H
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Dec; 8(12):1242-7. PubMed ID: 17133281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The performance of diffusive gradient in thin film probes for the long-term monitoring of trace level total mercury in water.
    Noh S; Kim YH; Kim H; Seok KS; Park M; Bailon MX; Hong Y
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Dec; 192(1):66. PubMed ID: 31879803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and calibration of a passive sampler for N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in water.
    Kaserzon SL; Kennedy K; Hawker DW; Holling N; Escher BI; Booij K; Mueller JF
    Chemosphere; 2011 Jul; 84(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 21477842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the use of passive sampling systems for understanding air mercury concentrations and dry deposition across Florida, USA.
    Peterson C; Alishahi M; Gustin MS
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 May; 424():297-307. PubMed ID: 22444056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calibration of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for monitoring selected polar and semi-polar pesticides in surface water.
    Gunold R; Schäfer RB; Paschke A; Schüürmann G; Liess M
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Sep; 155(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18068881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of Sulfide Nanoparticles on Dissolved Mercury and Zinc Quantification by Diffusive Gradient in Thin-Film Passive Samplers.
    Pham AL; Johnson C; Manley D; Hsu-Kim H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(21):12897-903. PubMed ID: 26414810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of deployment specific chemical uptake rates for SDB-RPD Empore disk using a passive flow monitor (PFM).
    O'Brien D; Bartkow M; Mueller JF
    Chemosphere; 2011 May; 83(9):1290-5. PubMed ID: 21481913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a novel composite resin for dissolved divalent mercury measurement using diffusive gradients in thin films.
    Yao H; Zhao Y; Lin CJ; Yi F; Liang X; Feng X
    Chemosphere; 2020 Jul; 251():126231. PubMed ID: 32169713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel method for the determination of dissolved methylmercury concentrations using diffusive gradients in thin films technique.
    Gao Y; De Craemer S; Baeyens W
    Talanta; 2014 Mar; 120():470-4. PubMed ID: 24468398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of deployment specific chemical uptake rates for SPMD and PDMS using a passive flow monitor.
    O'Brien D; Komarova T; Mueller JF
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2012 May; 64(5):1005-11. PubMed ID: 22406046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a miniaturized diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) device.
    Alexa N; Zhang H; Lead JR
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Nov; 655(1-2):80-5. PubMed ID: 19925919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance optimization of a membrane assisted passive sampler for monitoring of ionizable organic compounds in water.
    Chimuka L; Nemutandani T; Cukrowska E; Tutu H
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 18175026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chemcatcher and DGT passive sampling devices for regulatory monitoring of trace metals in surface water.
    Allan IJ; Knutsson J; Guigues N; Mills GA; Fouillac AM; Greenwood R
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jul; 10(7):821-9. PubMed ID: 18688449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A portable device for continuous analysis of dissolved gaseous mercury in natural waters.
    Fantozzi L; Ferrara R; Lanzillotta E
    Environ Technol; 2005 Nov; 26(11):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16335606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.