BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22892410)

  • 1. Prevalence of invalid computerized baseline neurocognitive test results in high school and collegiate athletes.
    Schatz P; Moser RS; Solomon GS; Ott SD; Karpf R
    J Athl Train; 2012; 47(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 22892410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity and specificity of the online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate athletes.
    Schatz P; Sandel N
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 23144368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age and test setting affect the prevalence of invalid baseline scores on neurocognitive tests.
    Lichtenstein JD; Moser RS; Schatz P
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 24243771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rates and Predictors of Invalid Baseline Test Performance in High School and Collegiate Athletes for 3 Computerized Neurocognitive Tests: ANAM, Axon Sports, and ImPACT.
    Nelson LD; Pfaller AY; Rein LE; McCrea MA
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26059178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance.
    Schatz P; Kelley T; Ott SD; Solomon GS; Elbin RJ; Higgins K; Moser RS
    J Athl Train; 2014; 49(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 25162778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance Validity in Collegiate Football Athletes at Baseline Neurocognitive Testing.
    Abeare C; Messa I; Whitfield C; Zuccato B; Casey J; Rykulski N; Erdodi L
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2019; 34(4):E20-E31. PubMed ID: 30499932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
    Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The prevalence and correlates of scores falling below ImPACT embedded validity indicators among adolescent student athletes.
    Liu BC; Iverson GL; Cook NE; Schatz P; Berkner P; Gaudet CE
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2024 Jul; 38(5):1175-1192. PubMed ID: 38233364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Invalid performance and the ImPACT in national collegiate athletic association division I football players.
    Szabo AJ; Alosco ML; Fedor A; Gunstad J
    J Athl Train; 2013; 48(6):851-5. PubMed ID: 24151810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related differences and reliability on computerized and paper-and-pencil neurocognitive assessment batteries.
    Register-Mihalik JK; Kontos DL; Guskiewicz KM; Mihalik JP; Conder R; Shields EW
    J Athl Train; 2012; 47(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 22892411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): a systematic review of the prevalence and assessment of invalid performance.
    Gaudet CE; Weyandt LL
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27687890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of invalid ImPACT baseline test results among high school athletes with invalidity and sandbagging indices.
    Tsushima WT; Lawton DRY; Kimata C; Siu AM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Oct; 37(7):1516-1529. PubMed ID: 36458597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collegiate Student Athletes With History of ADHD or Academic Difficulties Are More Likely to Produce an Invalid Protocol on Baseline ImPACT Testing.
    Manderino L; Gunstad J
    Clin J Sport Med; 2018 Mar; 28(2):111-116. PubMed ID: 28731886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence of Invalid Performance on Baseline Testing for Sport-Related Concussion by Age and Validity Indicator.
    Abeare CA; Messa I; Zuccato BG; Merker B; Erdodi L
    JAMA Neurol; 2018 Jun; 75(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 29532050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and Validity of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3 (SCAT3) in High School and Collegiate Athletes.
    Chin EY; Nelson LD; Barr WB; McCrory P; McCrea MA
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Sep; 44(9):2276-85. PubMed ID: 27281276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baseline Neurocognitive Performance and Clearance for Athletes to Return to Contact.
    Asken BM; Clugston JR; Snyder AR; Bauer RM
    J Athl Train; 2017 Jan; 52(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 27905859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex and age differences in depression and baseline sport-related concussion neurocognitive performance and symptoms.
    Covassin T; Elbin RJ; Larson E; Kontos AP
    Clin J Sport Med; 2012 Mar; 22(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 22246342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supervision and computerized neurocognitive baseline test performance in high school athletes: an initial investigation.
    Kuhn AW; Solomon GS
    J Athl Train; 2014; 49(6):800-5. PubMed ID: 25299577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid Number Naming and Quantitative Eye Movements May Reflect Contact Sport Exposure in a Collegiate Ice Hockey Cohort.
    Hasanaj L; Thawani SP; Webb N; Drattell JD; Serrano L; Nolan RC; Raynowska J; Hudson TE; Rizzo JR; Dai W; McComb B; Goldberg JD; Rucker JC; Galetta SL; Balcer LJ
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 38(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 28746058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Group versus individual administration affects baseline neurocognitive test performance.
    Moser RS; Schatz P; Neidzwski K; Ott SD
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2325-30. PubMed ID: 21828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.