253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22892628)
1. Reliability of digital radiographs for pediatric lower extremity alignment.
Nowicki PD; Vanderhave KL; Farley FA; Kuhns LR; Dahl W; Caird MS
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):631-5. PubMed ID: 22892628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the evaluation of mechanical axis deviation.
Gordon JE; Chen RC; Dobbs MB; Luhmann SJ; Rich MM; Schoenecker PL
J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 19305280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra- and interobserver reliability analysis of pediatric lower limb parameters on digital long leg radiographs.
Braun S; Brenneis M; Holder J; Meurer A; Stief F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jan; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 36707864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alignment and articular orientation of lower limbs: manual vs computer-aided measurements on digital radiograms.
Rozzanigo U; Pizzoli A; Minari C; Caudana R
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 15775892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lower limb alignment in children: reference values based on a full-length standing radiograph.
Sabharwal S; Zhao C; Edgar M
J Pediatr Orthop; 2008; 28(7):740-6. PubMed ID: 18812900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of lower-limb alignment measurements in patients with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia.
Akhmedov B; Sung KH; Chung CY; Lee KM; Park MS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3566-76. PubMed ID: 22948526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of the center edge angle and determination of the Severin classification using digital radiography, computer-assisted measurement tools, and a Severin algorithm: intraobserver and interobserver reliability revisited.
Carroll KL; Murray KA; MacLeod LM; Hennessey TA; Woiczik MR; Roach JW
J Pediatr Orthop; 2011 Jun; 31(4):e30-5. PubMed ID: 21572269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of Computer-Assisted and Manual Measurement Methods for Assessment of Graf Type 1 and Type 2 Hip Sonograms.
Bilgili F; Bilgili ÇÖ; Çetinkaya E; Polat A; Sungur İ; Saglam Y; Kasali K; Parmaksızoğlu AS
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1269-75. PubMed ID: 27151910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted analysis of lower limb geometry: higher intraobserver reliability compared to conventional method.
Hankemeier S; Gosling T; Richter M; Hufner T; Hochhausen C; Krettek C
Comput Aided Surg; 2006 Mar; 11(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 16782643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the Radiographic Sagittal and Frontal Tibiotalar Alignment after Ankle Arthrodesis.
Willegger M; Holinka J; Nemecek E; Bock P; Wanivenhaus AH; Windhager R; Schuh R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154224. PubMed ID: 27124403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle in tibia vara as measured on digital images by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons.
Lavelle WF; Shovlin J; Drvaric DM
J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Sep; 28(6):695-8. PubMed ID: 18724212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 5 different methods for measuring stress radiographs to improve reproducibility during the evaluation of knee instability.
Lee YS; Han SH; Jo J; Kwak KS; Nha KW; Kim JH
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jun; 39(6):1275-81. PubMed ID: 21350067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in lower-limb deformity correction measurements.
Feldman DS; Henderson ER; Levine HB; Schrank PL; Koval KJ; Patel RJ; Spencer DB; Sala DA; Egol KA
J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Mar; 27(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 17314647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of navigated lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomies.
Goleski P; Warkentine B; Lo D; Gyuricza C; Kendoff D; Pearle AD
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2179-86. PubMed ID: 18593844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precision of lumbar intervertebral measurements: does a computer-assisted technique improve reliability?
Pearson AM; Spratt KF; Genuario J; McGough W; Kosman K; Lurie J; Sengupta DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):572-80. PubMed ID: 21217439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction.
Guenoun B; Zadegan F; Aim F; Hannouche D; Nizard R
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Sep; 98(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 22858107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of anatomical lateral distal femoral angles obtained with four femoral axis methods in canine femora.
Miles JE; Mortensen M; Svalastoga EL; Eriksen T
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 25804405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
