209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22892922)
1. Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes.
Oliveira-Costa CD; Friedman G; Vieira SR; Fialkow L
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2012 Jul; 67(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 22892922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies.
Freitas FG; Bafi AT; Nascente AP; Assunção M; Mazza B; Azevedo LC; Machado FR
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 23161359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.
Myatra SN; Prabu NR; Divatia JV; Monnet X; Kulkarni AP; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 27922879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.
Mallat J; Meddour M; Durville E; Lemyze M; Pepy F; Temime J; Vangrunderbeeck N; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Tavernier B
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 26152341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.
De Backer D; Heenen S; Piagnerelli M; Koch M; Vincent JL
Intensive Care Med; 2005 Apr; 31(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15754196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
Wang J; Zhou D; Gao Y; Wu Z; Wang X; Lv C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(47):e22702. PubMed ID: 33217793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated pre-ejection period variation predicts fluid responsiveness in low tidal volume ventilated pigs.
Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 19681786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The role of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure in fluid responsiveness assessment in septic shock patient].
Zhao H; Wang X; Liu D
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 53(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 25146400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of using tidal volume challenge to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation reduced in low tidal volume ventilated critically ill patients with decreased respiratory system compliance.
Xu Y; Guo J; Wu Q; Chen J
BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 May; 22(1):137. PubMed ID: 35508962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness.
Vallée F; Richard JC; Mari A; Gallas T; Arsac E; Verlaan PS; Chousterman B; Samii K; Genestal M; Fourcade O
Intensive Care Med; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 19347330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
Charron C; Fessenmeyer C; Cosson C; Mazoit JX; Hebert JL; Benhamou D; Edouard AR
Anesth Analg; 2006 May; 102(5):1511-7. PubMed ID: 16632835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Measurement of brachial artery velocity variation and inferior vena cava variability to estimate fluid responsiveness].
Zhu W; Wan L; Wan X; Wang G; Su M; Liao G; Huang Q
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2016 Aug; 28(8):713-7. PubMed ID: 27434562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Passive leg raising test induced changes in plethysmographic variability index to assess fluid responsiveness in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure.
Mallat J; Lemyze M; Fischer MO
J Crit Care; 2024 Feb; 79():154449. PubMed ID: 37857068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Slope analysis for the prediction of fluid responsiveness by a stepwise PEEP elevation recruitment maneuver in mechanically ventilated patients.
Vallier S; Bouchet JB; Desebbe O; Francou C; Raphael D; Tardy B; Gergele L; Morel J
BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):4. PubMed ID: 34979928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during experimental intra-abdominal hypertension.
Díaz F; Erranz B; Donoso A; Salomon T; Cruces P
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 Sep; 15():127. PubMed ID: 26395001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Variability of peripheral arterial peak velocity predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Lu N; Jiang L; Zhu B; Han W; Zhao Y; Shi Y; Guo F; Xi X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 Mar; 30(3):224-229. PubMed ID: 29519280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of pulse pressure variations for fluid responsiveness prediction in mechanically ventilated patients with biphasic positive airway pressure mode.
Bataille B; Le Moal D; Renault T; Cocquet P; de Selle J; Silva S
J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Oct; 36(5):1479-1487. PubMed ID: 34865181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
