These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22893368)

  • 1. Hydraulic driven fast and precise nonmagnetic tactile stimulator for neurophysiological and MEG measurements.
    Broser PJ; Braun C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2852-8. PubMed ID: 22893368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ipsilateral primary sensorimotor cortical response to mechanical tactile stimuli.
    Hadoush H; Inoue K; Nakanishi K; Kurumadani H; Sunagawa T; Ochi M
    Neuroreport; 2010 Jan; 21(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 19997038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of prior sustained tactile stimulation on the somatosensory response to the sudden change of intensity in humans: an magnetoencephalography study.
    Otsuru N; Inui K; Yamashiro K; Urakawa T; Keceli S; Kakigi R
    Neuroscience; 2011 May; 182():115-24. PubMed ID: 21420471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cuff-type pneumatic stimulator for studying somatosensory evoked responses with fMRI.
    Gallasch E; Fend M; Rafolt D; Nardone R; Kunz A; Kronbichler M; Beisteiner R; Golaszewski S
    Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(3):1067-73. PubMed ID: 20079447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A brush stimulator for functional brain imaging.
    Jousmäki V; Nishitani N; Hari R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2620-4. PubMed ID: 17950032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal window of integration in the somatosensory modality: an MEG study.
    Yamashiro K; Inui K; Otsuru N; Urakawa T; Kakigi R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 122(11):2276-81. PubMed ID: 21524607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immaturity of somatosensory cortical processing in human newborns.
    Lauronen L; Nevalainen P; Wikström H; Parkkonen L; Okada Y; Pihko E
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 16908201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vibrotactile piezoelectric stimulation system with precise and versatile timing control for somatosensory research.
    Sun L; Okada Y
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Apr; 317():29-36. PubMed ID: 30738105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volumetric estimation of functional brain regions in small children using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography: differentiating thumb from middle finger.
    Xiang J; Holowka S; Qiao H; Sun B; Chuang S
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():110. PubMed ID: 16012596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maturation of somatosensory cortical processing from birth to adulthood revealed by magnetoencephalography.
    Pihko E; Nevalainen P; Stephen J; Okada Y; Lauronen L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 120(8):1552-61. PubMed ID: 19560400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical representation of dermatomes: MEG-derived maps after tactile stimulation.
    Castillo EM; Papanicolaou AC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 15808974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential effects of stimulus intensity on peripheral and neuromagnetic cortical responses to median nerve stimulation.
    Lin YY; Shih YH; Chen JT; Hsieh JC; Yeh TC; Liao KK; Kao CD; Lin KP; Wu ZA; Ho LT
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 14568461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation.
    Hesse MD; Nishitani N; Fink GR; Jousmäki V; Hari R
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Feb; 20(2):425-32. PubMed ID: 19505992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Non-Magnetic Rotating Disk Stimulator for the Study of Neuromagnetic Correlates of Sensorimotor Interaction.
    Broser PJ; Moor V; Braun C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Nov; 23(6):1078-84. PubMed ID: 25823039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical characterization and inter-dipole distance between unilateral median versus ulnar nerve stimulation of both hands in MEG.
    Theuvenet PJ; van Dijk BW; Peters MJ; van Ree JM; Lopes da Silva FL; Chen AC
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 19(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 16977490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting differences with magnetoencephalography of somatosensory processing after tactile and electrical stimuli.
    Hautasaari P; Kujala UM; Tarkka IM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Jan; 311():331-337. PubMed ID: 30218670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time, frequency and volumetric differences of high-frequency neuromagnetic oscillation between left and right somatosensory cortices.
    Kotecha R; Xiang J; Wang Y; Huo X; Hemasilpin N; Fujiwara H; Rose D; deGrauw T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 19041674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studying the human somatosensory hand area: A new way to compare fMRI and MEG.
    Stoeckel MC; Pollok B; Schnitzler A; Seitz RJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(2):280-91. PubMed ID: 17597225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evoked response amplitudes from somatosensory cortices do not determine reaction times to tactile stimuli.
    Ploner M; Platzen J; Pollok B; Gross J; Schnitzler A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3734-41. PubMed ID: 17610593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complexity analysis of source activity underlying the neuromagnetic somatosensory steady-state response.
    Vakorin VA; Ross B; Krakovska O; Bardouille T; Cheyne D; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 20132893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.