270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22894182)
1. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing.
Laback B; Zimmermann I; Majdak P; Baumgartner WD; Pok SM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1515-29. PubMed ID: 21895091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing.
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2817-26. PubMed ID: 22087910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bimodal listeners are not sensitive to interaural time differences in unmodulated low-frequency stimuli (L).
Lenssen A; Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3457-60. PubMed ID: 21682370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comodulation masking release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers.
Zirn S; Hempel JM; Schuster M; Hemmert W
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():60-6. PubMed ID: 23220120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences.
Fan Y; Gifford RH
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109020. PubMed ID: 38763034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.
van Hoesel RJ
Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 288(1-2):100-13. PubMed ID: 22226928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experiences of the use of FOX, an intelligent agent, for programming cochlear implant sound processors in new users.
Vaerenberg B; Govaerts PJ; de Ceulaer G; Daemers K; Schauwers K
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 21091083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users.
Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2338. PubMed ID: 28464641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.
Laback B; Majdak P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(2):814-7. PubMed ID: 18182489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users.
Fuller C; Free R; Maat B; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1009-16. PubMed ID: 22894221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
