270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22894182)
21. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb C; Kan A; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2272-87. PubMed ID: 23556595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of Channel Envelope Synchrony on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Francart T; Lenssen A; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):e199-206. PubMed ID: 25738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences.
Noel VA; Eddington DK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2314-28. PubMed ID: 23556598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Binaural interference in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Best V; Laback B; Majdak P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2939-50. PubMed ID: 22087922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sensitivity of bimodal listeners to interaural time differences with modulated single- and multiple-channel stimuli.
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 20571259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
Straatman LV; Rietveld AC; Beijen J; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1884-95. PubMed ID: 20968360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
Gifford RH; Grantham DW; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Dwyer R; Dorman MF
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():28-37. PubMed ID: 24607490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain.
Zakis JA; Fulton B; Steele BR
Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):906-13. PubMed ID: 23025794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Development of a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
Francart T; McDermott HJ
Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):114-24. PubMed ID: 23000118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants.
Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):4023-36. PubMed ID: 21682423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Spatial hearing in a child with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral cochlear implants.
Johnstone PM; Yeager KR; Noss E
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):400-8. PubMed ID: 23586418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
van Besouw RM; Forrester L; Crowe ND; Rowan D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.
Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Refractory effects of the N1 event-related potential in experienced cochlear implant patients.
Cowper-Smith CD; Green J; Maessen H; Bance M; Newman AJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 23282338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
