134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22894208)
1. Conversational quality evaluation of artificial bandwidth extension of telephone speech.
Pulakka H; Laaksonen L; Yrttiaho S; Myllylä V; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):848-61. PubMed ID: 22894208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
Smiljanic R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech.
Taal CH; Hendriks RC; Heusdens R; Jensen J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3013-27. PubMed ID: 22087929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intelligibility and listener preference of telephone speech in the presence of babble noise.
Hall JL; Flanagan JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 20058974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
Chen F; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Brand T; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
Hazan V; Baker R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
Lee PJ; Jeon JY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine.
Pohjalainen J; Raitio T; Yrttiaho S; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
Yang W; Bradley JS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
