These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22894234)

  • 41. Forward masking of diotic and dichotic clicks by noise.
    Hanna TE; Robinson DE; Shiffrin RM; Gilkey RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1171-7. PubMed ID: 7142581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Monotic and dichotic modulation detection interference in practiced and unpracticed subjects.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2637-41. PubMed ID: 8207136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Forward acoustic masking enhances the auditory brainstem response in a diotic, but not dichotic, paradigm in salicylate-induced tinnitus.
    Liu XP; Chen L
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():51-60. PubMed ID: 25668125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
    Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
    Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Masking of low-frequency signals by high-frequency, high-level narrow bands of noise.
    Patra H; Roup CM; Feth LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):876-87. PubMed ID: 21361445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.
    Smits C; Watson CS; Kidd GR; Moore DR; Goverts ST
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 26940045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals.
    Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Kösem A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL249. PubMed ID: 28372048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.
    Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1562-73. PubMed ID: 16583901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Factors contributing to comodulation masking release with dichotic maskers.
    Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):1905-8. PubMed ID: 19062829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. PubMed ID: 12430820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.
    Miller RE; Gibbs BE; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3058. PubMed ID: 29857765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.