These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22894310)

  • 1. Automated detection of alarm sounds.
    Lutfi RA; Heo I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL125-8. PubMed ID: 22894310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Music and hearing aids--an introduction.
    Chasin M
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 23258616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial.
    Chasin M; Hockley N
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):135. PubMed ID: 23258615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Musicians and hearing aid design--is your hearing instrument being overworked?
    Schmidt M
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 23258617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.
    Hockley NS; Bahlmann F; Fulton B
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):146-58. PubMed ID: 23258618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.
    Duran SI; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3849-55. PubMed ID: 23231115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound fields in complex listening environments.
    Vorländer M
    Trends Amplif; 2011 Sep; 15(3):106-15. PubMed ID: 21676999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids.
    Nordholm S; Schepker H; Tran LTT; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):150. PubMed ID: 29390746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.
    Kim G; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1581-96. PubMed ID: 21895096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1262-71. PubMed ID: 20815461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
    Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
    Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
    Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants.
    Kokkinakis K; Azimi B; Hu Y; Friedland DR
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):102-16. PubMed ID: 22923425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.