340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22894432)
1. Is it sensible to "deform" dose? 3D experimental validation of dose-warping.
Yeo UJ; Taylor ML; Supple JR; Smith RL; Dunn L; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5065-72. PubMed ID: 22894432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of 12 DIR algorithms in low-contrast regions for mass and density conserving deformation.
Yeo UJ; Supple JR; Taylor ML; Smith R; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101701. PubMed ID: 24089891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel methodology for 3D deformable dosimetry.
Yeo UJ; Taylor ML; Dunn L; Kron T; Smith RL; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2203-13. PubMed ID: 22482642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios.
Roussakis YG; Dehghani H; Green S; Webster GJ
Br J Radiol; 2015 May; 88(1049):20140691. PubMed ID: 25791569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms.
Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5000-6. PubMed ID: 19994509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Uncertainties in dose warping due to the choice of deformable registration algorithm.
Veiga C; Lourenço AM; Mouinuddin S; van Herk M; Modat M; Ourselin S; Royle G; McClelland JR
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):760-9. PubMed ID: 25652490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification.
Moteabbed M; Sharp GC; Wang Y; Trofimov A; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):196-205. PubMed ID: 25563260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose warping performance in deformable image registration in lung.
Moriya S; Tachibana H; Kitamura N; Sawant A; Sato M
Phys Med; 2017 May; 37():16-23. PubMed ID: 28535910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility and validation of biomechanical deformable image registration in low-contrast images.
Velec M; Juang T; Moseley JL; Oldham M; Brock KK
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(4):e401-8. PubMed ID: 25823381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deformable abdominal phantom for the validation of real-time image guidance and deformable dose accumulation.
Matrosic CK; Hull J; Palmer B; Culberson W; Bednarz B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):122-133. PubMed ID: 31355997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional dose verification for intensity modulated radiation therapy using optical CT based polymer gel dosimetry.
Wuu CS; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1412-9. PubMed ID: 16752577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of an MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) program: Deformation accuracy in a heterogeneous, deformable, anthropomorphic phantom.
Mittauer KE; Hill PM; Bassetti MF; Bayouth JE
Radiother Oncol; 2020 May; 146():97-109. PubMed ID: 32146260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of an x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry system in the measurement of deformed dose.
Maynard E; Heath E; Hilts M; Jirasek A
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Apr; 6(3):035031. PubMed ID: 33438676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance variations among clinically available deformable image registration tools in adaptive radiotherapy - how should we evaluate and interpret the result?
Nie K; Pouliot J; Smith E; Chuang C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27074457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient-specific calibration of cone-beam computed tomography data sets for radiotherapy dose calculations and treatment plan assessment.
MacFarlane M; Wong D; Hoover DA; Wong E; Johnson C; Battista JJ; Chen JZ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 29479821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of the performance of different deformable image registration algorithms in helical, axial, and cone-beam CT images using a mobile phantom.
Ali I; Alsbou N; Jaskowiak J; Ahmad S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):62-73. PubMed ID: 29446235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for "dose of the day" calculations.
Veiga C; McClelland J; Moinuddin S; Lourenço A; Ricketts K; Annkah J; Modat M; Ourselin S; D'Souza D; Royle G
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031703. PubMed ID: 24593707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
Huang Y; Li C; Wang H; Hu Q; Wang R; Chang C; Ma W; Li W; Wu H; Zhang Y
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():82-87. PubMed ID: 32097874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation.
Niu CJ; Foltz WD; Velec M; Moseley JL; Al-Mayah A; Brock KK
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):765-76. PubMed ID: 22320786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
