409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22894449)
1. Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning.
Cao W; Lim GJ; Lee A; Li Y; Liu W; Ronald Zhu X; Zhang X
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5248-56. PubMed ID: 22894449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An uncertainty-incorporated method for fast beam angle selection in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Ramar N; Meher SR
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(3):688-696. PubMed ID: 37470595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques.
Liu W; Li Y; Li X; Cao W; Zhang X
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3089-101. PubMed ID: 22755694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Chen W; Unkelbach J; Trofimov A; Madden T; Kooy H; Bortfeld T; Craft D
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 22222720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
Liu W; Zhang X; Li Y; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1079-91. PubMed ID: 22320818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
An Y; Liang J; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28044325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025004. PubMed ID: 30523932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing photon and proton-based hypofractioned SBRT for prostate cancer accounting for robustness and realistic treatment deliverability.
Goddard LC; Brodin NP; Bodner WR; Garg MK; Tomé WA
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20180010. PubMed ID: 29436852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers.
Liu W; Mohan R; Park P; Liu Z; Li H; Li X; Li Y; Wu R; Sahoo N; Dong L; Zhu XR; Grosshans DR
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(6):384-91. PubMed ID: 25407859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Algorithm and performance of a clinical IMRT beam-angle optimization system.
Djajaputra D; Wu Q; Wu Y; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):3191-212. PubMed ID: 14579860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of setup and range uncertainties on TCP and NTCP following VMAT or IMPT of oropharyngeal cancer patients.
Hamming-Vrieze O; Depauw N; Craft DL; Chan AW; Rasch CRN; Verheij M; Sonke JJ; Kooy HM
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(9):095001. PubMed ID: 30921775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel and individualized robust optimization method using normalized dose interval volume constraints (NDIVC) for intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy.
Shan J; Sio TT; Liu C; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):382-393. PubMed ID: 30387870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Shan J; Yang Y; Schild SE; Daniels TB; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5428-5440. PubMed ID: 32964474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The rationale for intensity-modulated proton therapy in geometrically challenging cases.
Safai S; Trofimov A; Adams JA; Engelsman M; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6337-53. PubMed ID: 23965339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
