These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2289449)

  • 1. A comparative EEG/MEG equivalent dipole study of the pattern onset visual response.
    Stok CJ; Spekreijse HJ; Peters MJ; Boom HB; Lopes da Silva FH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1990; 41():34-50. PubMed ID: 2289449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [EEG/MEG source localization in local stimulation of the retina].
    Schellhorn K; Hoenecke O; Haueisen J; Schultheiss B; Henning G; Husar P; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():437-8. PubMed ID: 9517226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Topographic mapping of the pattern onset evoked magnetic response to stimulation of different portions of the visual field.
    Harding GF; Degg C; Anderson SJ; Holliday I; Fylan F; Barnes G; Bedford J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 May; 16(2-3):175-83. PubMed ID: 8089036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined EEG and MEG recordings of visual 40 Hz responses to illusory triangles in human.
    Tallon-Baudry C; Bertrand O; Wienbruch C; Ross B; Pantev C
    Neuroreport; 1997 Mar; 8(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 9175093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The early component of the visual evoked magnetic field.
    Yoneda K; Sekimoto S; Yumoto M; Sugishita M
    Neuroreport; 1995 Mar; 6(5):797-800. PubMed ID: 7605951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ocular dominance affects magnitude of dipole moment: an MEG study.
    Shima H; Hasegawa M; Tachibana O; Nomura M; Yamashita J; Ozaki Y; Kawai J; Higuchi M; Kado H
    Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(12):817-21. PubMed ID: 20613677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pattern visual evoked potentials recorded from human occipital cortex with chronic subdural electrodes.
    Noachtar S; Hashimoto T; Lüders H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(6):435-46. PubMed ID: 7694829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presence of strong harmonics during visual entrainment: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Heinrichs-Graham E; Wilson TW
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Sep; 91(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 22569101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrepancy between reaction time and visual evoked magnetic response latency under priming.
    Hashimoto A; Inui K; Watanabe S; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Mar; 60(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 18177961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemi-field pattern visual evoked potentials: a comparison of display and analysis techniques.
    Towle VL; Brigell M; Spire JP
    Brain Topogr; 1989; 1(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 2641269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of the hemisphere activated by hemifield visual stimulation using a single equivalent dipole model.
    Brigell M; Rubboli G; Celesia GG
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Nov; 87(5):291-9. PubMed ID: 7693440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multifocal magnetoencephalogram applied to objective visual field analysis.
    Nishiyama T; Ohde H; Haruta Y; Mashima Y; Oguchi Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2004; 48(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15064972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of the visual evoked magnetic field with the m-sequence technique.
    Tabuchi H; Yokoyama T; Shimogawara M; Shiraki K; Nagasaka E; Miki T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 43(6):2045-54. PubMed ID: 12037017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing of early activity in the visual cortex as revealed by simultaneous MEG and ERG recordings.
    Inui K; Sannan H; Miki K; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):239-44. PubMed ID: 16310379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal check size and reversal rate to elicit pattern-reversal MEG responses.
    Chen WT; Ko YC; Liao KK; Hsieh JC; Yeh TC; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2005 May; 32(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 16018158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Localization of brain sources of visually evoked responses: using single and multiple dipoles. An overview of different approaches.
    da Silva FH; Spekreijse H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1991; 42():38-46. PubMed ID: 1915029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Visual information processing and the mechanism of vision. Clinical application].
    Oguchi Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Dec; 102(12):850-75. PubMed ID: 10025116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motion-onset VEPs to translating, radial, rotating and spiral stimuli.
    Kremlácek J; Kuba M; Kubová Z; Chlubnová J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 109(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 15881263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.