These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2289593)

  • 1. [Esthetic restoration of the posterior sector. State of the art].
    Prati C; Tiozzi E; Giommoni E
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Nov-15; 58(17):72-6, 79-85. PubMed ID: 2289593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some principles in the selection and use of some tooth-coloured materials and techniques--1998.
    Bryant R
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1998 Oct; 14():86-93. PubMed ID: 10895618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adhesion and tooth-colored restoratives.
    Duke ES
    Curr Opin Dent; 1991 Apr; 1(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 1777661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictable restoration of Class 2 preparations with composite resin.
    Strassler HE; Trushkowsky RD
    Dent Today; 2004 Jan; 23(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 14969004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
    Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Miller RC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 9545909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations.
    Poss SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aspects of the use and abuse of aesthetic restoratives. 2. Dentine adhesives and glass-ionomer cements.
    Pearson GJ
    Dent Update; 1990 May; 17(4):164-7. PubMed ID: 2103540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration of posterior teeth with composite resin. 1: Direct-placement composite.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    Dent Update; 1996 Dec; 23(10):406-10. PubMed ID: 9610271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth: practical and clinical considerations.
    Magne P; Dietschi D; Holz J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Apr; 16(2):104-19. PubMed ID: 9084299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.