These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22896045)

  • 21. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of visual cross-modal conflict with semantic and nonsemantic distractors on working memory task: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Sawamura D; Tanabe Y; Sakuraba S; Cui J; Miura H; Saito R; Sugi M; Watanabe A; Tokikuni Y; Sugawara K; Miyazaki M; Miyamoto R; Sakai S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(36):e30330. PubMed ID: 36086757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of visual speech in phonological processing by children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Tye-Murray N; Abdi H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):412-34. PubMed ID: 19339701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in lexical priming of young children who stutter: preliminary findings.
    Hartfield KN; Conture EG
    J Fluency Disord; 2006; 31(4):303-24. PubMed ID: 17010422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The development of sentence interpretation: effects of perceptual, attentional and semantic interference.
    Leech R; Aydelott J; Symons G; Carnevale J; Dick F
    Dev Sci; 2007 Nov; 10(6):794-813. PubMed ID: 17973797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Audio-visual speech perception off the top of the head.
    Davis C; Kim J
    Cognition; 2006 Jul; 100(3):B21-31. PubMed ID: 16289070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.
    Lachs L; Pisoni DB; Kirk KI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):236-51. PubMed ID: 11409859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiovisual speech perception development at varying levels of perceptual processing.
    Lalonde K; Holt RF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1713. PubMed ID: 27106318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Colavita dominance effect revisited: the effect of semantic congruity.
    Stubblefield A; Jacobs LA; Kim Y; Goolkasian P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1827-39. PubMed ID: 23943499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Different neural processes underlie visual speech perception in school-age children and adults: An event-related potentials study.
    Kaganovich N; Ancel E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Aug; 184():98-122. PubMed ID: 31015101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatiotemporal convergence of semantic processing in reading and speech perception.
    Vartiainen J; Parviainen T; Salmelin R
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 29(29):9271-80. PubMed ID: 19625517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissociating stimulus-driven semantic and phonological effect during reading and naming.
    Mechelli A; Josephs O; Lambon Ralph MA; McClelland JL; Price CJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Mar; 28(3):205-17. PubMed ID: 16767767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dissociating the time courses of the cross-modal semantic priming effects elicited by naturalistic sounds and spoken words.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28600716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Testing the protracted lexical restructuring hypothesis: the effects of position and acoustic-phonetic clarity on sensitivity to mispronunciations in children and adults.
    Bowey JA; Hirakis E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16546204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.