These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22896961)
21. Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill. Sadoff RL Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 7216207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The patient faced with the inescapable ruling of the liberty and detention judge]. Mercier N Soins Psychiatr; 2012; (281):34-5. PubMed ID: 22896966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The ethical questions raised by the law of July 5th, 2011]. Mazodier M Soins Psychiatr; 2012; (281):36-7. PubMed ID: 22896967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dangerous or merely difficult? The new population of forensic mental hospitals. Schanda H; Stompe T; Ortwein-Swoboda G Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 24(6):365-72. PubMed ID: 19717282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Implementation of order of compulsory ambulatory treatment in Jerusalem. El YC; Durst R; Rabinowitz J; Kalian M; Teitelbaum A; Shlafman M Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 9526716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Reform in French legislation concerning psychiatric hospitalization 1838-1990. Caroli F Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 48 Suppl():125-8. PubMed ID: 7799537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reform of "hogosha" system and psychiatric practice in Japan. Shiraishi H Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 48 Suppl():117-24. PubMed ID: 7799536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rights of the patient vs. rights of the public in the "Treatment of the Mentally Ill Law--1991". Bazak J Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 7558765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Seclusion and restraint: lessons from law, psychiatry, and psychology. Wexler DB Int J Law Psychiatry; 1982; 5(3-4):285-94. PubMed ID: 7184875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Florida's outpatient commitment law: a lesson in failed reform? Petrila J; Christy A Psychiatr Serv; 2008 Jan; 59(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 18182534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The revision of the mental health commitment law in Belgium: the medical viewpoint. Lecompte D; Pelc I; Szafran W; Abeloos MT Med Law; 1993; 12(3-5):305-9. PubMed ID: 8231699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Involuntary detention and treatment of the mentally ill: China's 2012 Mental Health Law. Ding C Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):581-8. PubMed ID: 24630738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The development of new psychiatric legislation in Sweden. Johanson E Med Law; 1993; 12(1-2):165-9. PubMed ID: 8377610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Misinterpretations of the law of 30 June 1838 concerning psychiatric admissions without the consent of the hospitalized person]. Boscredon J; Vignes M; Makowski J Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1988; 146(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 3239876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Decision makers in law and psychiatry and the involuntary civil commitment process. Lipsitt PD; Lelos D Community Ment Health J; 1981; 17(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 7347628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Outpatient treatment of forensic patients in Germany: current structure and future developments. Nedopil N; Banzer K Int J Law Psychiatry; 1996; 19(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 8929660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The least restrictive alternative: more about less. Klein J Psychiatr Q; 1983; 55(2-3):106-14. PubMed ID: 6679600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]