These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search. Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Object perception is selectively slowed by a visually similar working memory load. Robinson A; Manzi A; Triesch J J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):7.1-13. PubMed ID: 19146273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidental learning of probability information is differentially affected by the type of visual working memory representation. van Lamsweerde AE; Beck MR Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Dec; 69(4):283-96. PubMed ID: 26010021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of convexity in perception of symmetry and in visual short-term memory. Bertamini M; Helmy MS; Hulleman J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(4):767-85. PubMed ID: 22984923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration of perceptual information in word access. Richter T; Zwaan RA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 19424906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Similarity on the rebound: inhibition of similarity assessment leads to an ironic postsuppressional rebound. Geeraert N; Van Boven L; Yzerbyt VY Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1788-96. PubMed ID: 21526455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection. Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetries in stimulus comparisons by monkey and man. Op de Beeck H; Wagemans J; Vogels R Curr Biol; 2003 Oct; 13(20):1803-8. PubMed ID: 14561406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developmental changes in the effect of dimensional salience on the discriminability of object relations. Thompson LA; Markson L J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9679077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical and physical magnitudes are mapped into time. Ben-Meir S; Ganor-Stern D; Tzelgov J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2309-20. PubMed ID: 22643130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast similarities: efficiency advantages of similarity-focused comparisons. Corcoran K; Epstude K; Damisch L; Mussweiler T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1280-6. PubMed ID: 21707213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition. Ngo CT; Brown A; Sargent J; Dopkins S Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An extended study of the nonindependence of stimulus properties in human classification learning. Mathy F; Bradmetz J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):41-64. PubMed ID: 20680890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory. Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]