These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22897680)

  • 21. Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain.
    Siegenthaler E; Bochud Y; Bergamin P; Wurtz P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 22762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of Display Curvature, Presbyopia, and Task Duration on Visual Fatigue, Task Performance, and User Satisfaction.
    Choi D; Kyung G; Nam K; Park S
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):273-287. PubMed ID: 30281334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of vibration on visual display terminal work performance.
    Hsieh YH; Lin CJ; Chen HC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1055-8. PubMed ID: 18380100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects.
    Courtney AJ
    Ergonomics; 1994 May; 37(5):865-77. PubMed ID: 8206055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Egocentric reference in bidirectional readers as measured by the straight-ahead pointing task.
    Kazandjian S; Dupierrix E; Gaash E; Love IY; Zivotofsky AZ; De Agostini M; Chokron S
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():133-41. PubMed ID: 18973747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing.
    Emam TA; Hanna G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Feb; 16(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 11967676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brain-computer interfaces for 1-D and 2-D cursor control: designs using volitional control of the EEG spectrum or steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Trejo LJ; Rosipal R; Matthews B
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Jun; 14(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 16792300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Task factor usability ratings for different age groups writing Chinese.
    Chan AH; So JC
    Ergonomics; 2009 Nov; 52(11):1372-85. PubMed ID: 19851905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How do typographical factors affect reading text and comprehension performance in Arabic?
    Ganayim D; Ibrahim R
    Hum Factors; 2013 Apr; 55(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 23691828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Movement compatibility for frontal controls with displays located in four cardinal orientations.
    Chan AH; Hoffmann ER
    Ergonomics; 2010 Dec; 53(12):1403-19. PubMed ID: 21108078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of human finger and Chinese character on Chinese handwriting performance on mobile touch devices.
    Chen Z; Rau PL; Chen C
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):553-68. PubMed ID: 24930175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Alternative computer mouse designs: performance, posture, and subjective evaluations for college students aged 18-25.
    Feathers DJ; Rollings K; Hedge A
    Work; 2013; 44 Suppl 1():S115-22. PubMed ID: 23241688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [A bibliographic study on Tongui-bigan with a special reference to its influence on Japan and China].
    Park KR
    Uisahak; 2000 Dec; 9(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 12192672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eye movements of second language learners when reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text.
    Shen D; Liversedge SP; Tian J; Zang C; Cui L; Bai X; Yan G; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Jun; 18(2):192-202. PubMed ID: 22545927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Display-control compatibility: the relationship between performance and judgments of performance.
    Tlauka M
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 14668162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial stimulus response compatibility for a horizontal visual display with hand and foot controls.
    Chan KW; Chan AH
    Ergonomics; 2011 Mar; 54(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 21390953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Left visual-field advantage in the dual-stream RSVP task and reading-direction: a study in three nations.
    Smigasiewicz K; Shalgi S; Hsieh S; Möller F; Jaffe S; Chang CC; Verleger R
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2852-60. PubMed ID: 20546763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The implications of cross-regional differences for the design of In-vehicle Information Systems: a comparison of Australian and Chinese drivers.
    Young KL; Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):564-73. PubMed ID: 21944830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Utilising psychophysical techniques to investigate the effects of age, typeface design, size and display polarity on glance legibility.
    Dobres J; Chahine N; Reimer B; Gould D; Mehler B; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2016 Oct; 59(10):1377-1391. PubMed ID: 26727912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.