These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22897974)

  • 1. Diagnostic randomized controlled trials: the final frontier.
    Rodger M; Ramsay T; Fergusson D
    Trials; 2012 Aug; 13():137. PubMed ID: 22897974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.
    Menten J; Lesaffre E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():70. PubMed ID: 26315894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of good diagnostic studies.
    Mol BW; Lijmer JG; Evers JL; Bossuyt PM
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 12806556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency of study designs in diagnostic randomized clinical trials.
    Lu B; Gatsonis C
    Stat Med; 2013 Apr; 32(9):1451-66. PubMed ID: 23071073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A potential for seamless designs in diagnostic research could be identified.
    Vach W; Bibiza E; Gerke O; Bossuyt PM; Friede T; Zapf A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():51-59. PubMed ID: 32991994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy.
    van Stralen KJ; Stel VS; Reitsma JB; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Jun; 75(12):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 19340091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Hansell DM; Wells AU
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Aug; 58(8):573-4. PubMed ID: 12887948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
    de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
    Valenstein PN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling.
    Meads CA; Cnossen JS; Meher S; Juarez-Garcia A; ter Riet G; Duley L; Roberts TE; Mol BW; van der Post JA; Leeflang MM; Barton PM; Hyde CJ; Gupta JK; Khan KS
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 Mar; 12(6):iii-iv, 1-270. PubMed ID: 18331705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ethics of testing a test: randomized trials of the health impact of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases.
    Dowdy DW; Gounder CR; Corbett EL; Ngwira LG; Chaisson RE; Merritt MW
    Clin Infect Dis; 2012 Dec; 55(11):1522-6. PubMed ID: 22918990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed.
    Van den Bruel A; Cleemput I; Aertgeerts B; Ramaekers D; Buntinx F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 60(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 17938052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-invasive diagnostic assessment tools for the detection of liver fibrosis in patients with suspected alcohol-related liver disease: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Stevenson M; Lloyd-Jones M; Morgan MY; Wong R
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(4):1-174. PubMed ID: 22333291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
    Colditz GA
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance enterography compared with ultrasonography in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn's disease patients: the METRIC diagnostic accuracy study.
    Taylor SA; Mallett S; Bhatnagar G; Morris S; Quinn L; Tomini F; Miles A; Baldwin-Cleland R; Bloom S; Gupta A; Hamlin PJ; Hart AL; Higginson A; Jacobs I; McCartney S; Murray CD; Plumb AA; Pollok RC; Rodriguez-Justo M; Shabir Z; Slater A; Tolan D; Travis S; Windsor A; Wylie P; Zealley I; Halligan S
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Aug; 23(42):1-162. PubMed ID: 31432777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.