163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22897992)
1. MR cine DENSE dyssynchrony parameters for the evaluation of heart failure: comparison with myocardial tissue tagging.
Budge LP; Helms AS; Salerno M; Kramer CM; Epstein FH; Bilchick KC
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 5(8):789-97. PubMed ID: 22897992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with systolic dysfunction: a comparison of circumferential strain MR-tagging metrics.
El Ghannudi S; Germain P; Jeung MY; Breton E; Croisille P; Durand E; Roy C; Gangi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1238-46. PubMed ID: 24925128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block canine model: Comparison between cine and tagged MRI.
Saporito S; van Assen HC; Houthuizen P; Aben JP; Strik M; van Middendorp LB; Prinzen FW; Mischi M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):956-63. PubMed ID: 26973138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of left bundle branch block on left ventricular remodeling, dyssynchrony and deformation of the mitral valve apparatus: an observational cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study.
van der Land V; Germans T; van Dijk J; Zwanenburg JJ; Spreeuwenberg M; Marcus JT; Kamp O; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Aug; 23(4):529-36. PubMed ID: 17146618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of dyssynchrony and myocardial scar predicts function class improvement following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Bilchick KC; Dimaano V; Wu KC; Helm RH; Weiss RG; Lima JA; Berger RD; Tomaselli GF; Bluemke DA; Halperin HR; Abraham T; Kass DA; Lardo AC
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Sep; 1(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 19356481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diminished left ventricular dyssynchrony and impact of resynchronization in failing hearts with right versus left bundle branch block.
Byrne MJ; Helm RH; Daya S; Osman NF; Halperin HR; Berger RD; Kass DA; Lardo AC
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Oct; 50(15):1484-90. PubMed ID: 17919569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Singular Value Decomposition Applied to Cardiac Strain from MR Imaging for Selection of Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Candidates.
Ramachandran R; Chen X; Kramer CM; Epstein FH; Bilchick KC
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 25581423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strain imaging to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic comparison of strain parameters using multiple imaging techniques.
Zweerink A; van Everdingen WM; Nijveldt R; Salden OAE; Meine M; Maass AH; Vernooy K; de Lange FJ; Vos MA; Croisille P; Clarysse P; Geelhoed B; Rienstra M; van Gelder IC; van Rossum AC; Cramer MJ; Allaart CP
ESC Heart Fail; 2018 Dec; 5(6):1130-1140. PubMed ID: 30051598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of mechanical activation, scar, and electrical timing on cardiac resynchronization therapy response and clinical outcomes.
Bilchick KC; Kuruvilla S; Hamirani YS; Ramachandran R; Clarke SA; Parker KM; Stukenborg GJ; Mason P; Ferguson JD; Moorman JR; Malhotra R; Mangrum JM; Darby AE; Dimarco J; Holmes JW; Salerno M; Kramer CM; Epstein FH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 63(16):1657-66. PubMed ID: 24583155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography.
van Everdingen WM; Zweerink A; Nijveldt R; Salden OAE; Meine M; Maass AH; Vernooy K; De Lange FJ; van Rossum AC; Croisille P; Clarysse P; Geelhoed B; Rienstra M; Van Gelder IC; Vos MA; Allaart CP; Cramer MJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 34(3):443-456. PubMed ID: 29043465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative comparison of 2D and 3D circumferential strain using MRI tagging in normal and LBBB hearts.
Tecelão SR; Zwanenburg JJ; Kuijer JP; de Cock CC; Germans T; van Rossum AC; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Med; 2007 Mar; 57(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 17326172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative mechanical dyssynchrony in dilated cardiomyopathy measured by deformable registration algorithm.
Xu Y; He S; Li W; Wan K; Wang J; Mui D; Yang F; Liu H; Cheng W; Zhou X; Wetzl J; Sun J; Chen Y
Eur Radiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):2010-2020. PubMed ID: 31953665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Circumferential myocardial strain in cardiomyopathy with and without left bundle branch block.
Han Y; Chan J; Haber I; Peters DC; Zimetbaum PJ; Manning WJ; Yeon SB
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Jan; 12(1):2. PubMed ID: 20047696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Segment length in cine (SLICE) strain analysis: a practical approach to estimate potential benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Zweerink A; Nijveldt R; Braams NJ; Maass AH; Vernooy K; de Lange FJ; Meine M; Geelhoed B; Rienstra M; van Gelder IC; Vos MA; van Rossum AC; Allaart CP
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Jan; 23(1):4. PubMed ID: 33423681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.
Zhang W; Huang J; Qi Y; Wang F; Guo L; Shi X; Wu W; Zhou X; Li R
Heart Rhythm; 2019 Dec; 16(12):1783-1790. PubMed ID: 31513945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of dyssynchrony in the prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Sohal M; Duckett SG; Zhuang X; Shi W; Ginks M; Shetty A; Sammut E; Kozerke S; Niederer S; Smith N; Ourselin S; Rinaldi CA; Rueckert D; Carr-White G; Razavi R
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Aug; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 25084814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biventricular pacing during cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Vago H; Czimbalmos C; Papp R; Szabo L; Toth A; Dohy Z; Csecs I; Suhai F; Kosztin A; Molnar L; Geller L; Merkely B
Europace; 2020 Jan; 22(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31713632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by cardiac magnetic resonance is greater in patients with strict vs nonstrict electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle-branch block.
Andersson LG; Wu KC; Wieslander B; Loring Z; Frank TF; Maynard C; Gerstenblith G; Tomaselli GF; Weiss RG; Wagner GS; Ugander M; Strauss DG
Am Heart J; 2013 Jun; 165(6):956-63. PubMed ID: 23708167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CMR DENSE and the Seattle Heart Failure Model Inform Survival and Arrhythmia Risk After CRT.
Bilchick KC; Auger DA; Abdishektaei M; Mathew R; Sohn MW; Cai X; Sun C; Narayan A; Malhotra R; Darby A; Mangrum JM; Mehta N; Ferguson J; Mazimba S; Mason PK; Kramer CM; Levy WC; Epstein FH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Apr; 13(4):924-936. PubMed ID: 31864974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain.
Cao JJ; Ngai N; Duncanson L; Cheng J; Gliganic K; Chen Q
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 29669563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]