These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22898342)

  • 1. How will the digital age enhance the evaluation of diabetic retinopathy?
    Smiddy WE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):425-6. PubMed ID: 22898342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Ferrier NJ; Krupinski EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Nov; 51(11):5846-52. PubMed ID: 20484593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital image compression should be limited in diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Basu A
    J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12(4):163-5. PubMed ID: 16774695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
    Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grading diabetic retinopathy severity from compressed digital retinal images compared with uncompressed images and film.
    Li HK; Florez-Arango JF; Hubbard LD; Esquivel A; Danis RP; Krupinski EA
    Retina; 2010; 30(10):1651-61. PubMed ID: 20921928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mosaics versus Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy seven standard fields for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK; Esquivel A; Hubbard LD; Florez-Arango JF; Danis RP; Krupinski EA
    Retina; 2011 Sep; 31(8):1553-63. PubMed ID: 21522039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography.
    Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T
    Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera.
    Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation.
    Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Florez-Arango JF; Esquivel A; Krupinski EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6753-61. PubMed ID: 20574011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photoscreening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of image quality between film photography and digital imaging.
    Klais CM; Grupchev ID; McGhee CN; Donaldson ML
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Aug; 32(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 15281974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National screening programme for diabetic retinopathy. Digital image may be better for screening.
    Clements C
    BMJ; 2002 Apr; 324(7341):849; author reply 849-50. PubMed ID: 11934785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
    Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Targeted mydriasis strategies for diabetic retinopathy screening clinics.
    Dervan EW; O'Brien PD; Hobbs H; Acheson R; Flitcroft DI
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Jul; 24(7):1207-12. PubMed ID: 20139914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
    Li Z; Wu C; Olayiwola JN; Hilaire DS; Huang JJ
    Conn Med; 2012 Feb; 76(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 22670358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National screening programme for diabetic retinopathy. Screening by retinal photography offers holistic package of diabetic care.
    Prince CB
    BMJ; 2002 Apr; 324(7341):849; author reply 849-50. PubMed ID: 11936161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
    Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Managing 'suspicious glaucomatous discs' identified during digital-photography-based diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Steele C; Steel D; Bone H; McParland L; Green L; Fraser S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16390478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
    Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.