195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22898644)
1. Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
Taylor JR; Henson RN
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3027-40. PubMed ID: 22898644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection.
Taylor JR; Buratto LG; Henson RN
Cortex; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1511-25. PubMed ID: 23026757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory.
Woollams AM; Taylor JR; Karayanidis F; Henson RN
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 20(6):1114-29. PubMed ID: 18211248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.
Evans LH; Wilding EL
J Neurosci; 2012 May; 32(21):7253-7. PubMed ID: 22623670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of task-set adoption on ERP correlates of controlled and automatic recognition memory.
Wilckens KA; Tremel JJ; Wolk DA; Wheeler ME
Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1384-92. PubMed ID: 21211568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.
Wais PE; Mickes L; Wixted JT
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 18004949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Many roads lead to recognition: electrophysiological correlates of familiarity derived from short-term masked repetition priming.
Lucas HD; Taylor JR; Henson RN; Paller KA
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3041-52. PubMed ID: 23010141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.
Ingram KM; Mickes L; Wixted JT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 21967320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing recollection and familiarity of similar lures in a behavioral pattern separation task.
Kim J; Yassa MA
Hippocampus; 2013 Apr; 23(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 23401187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological signals associated with fluency of different levels of processing reveal multiple contributions to recognition memory.
Li B; Taylor JR; Wang W; Gao C; Guo C
Conscious Cogn; 2017 Aug; 53():1-13. PubMed ID: 28558307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Familiarity is related to conceptual implicit memory: an examination of individual differences.
Wang WC; Yonelinas AP
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1154-64. PubMed ID: 22833341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impaired capacity for familiarity after hippocampal damage.
Song Z; Wixted JT; Hopkins RO; Squire LR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jun; 108(23):9655-60. PubMed ID: 21606344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of multiple study-test repetition on the neural correlates of recognition memory: ERPs dissociate remembering and knowing.
De Chastelaine M; Friedman D; Cycowicz YM; Horton C
Psychophysiology; 2009 Jan; 46(1):86-99. PubMed ID: 19055497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.
Kafkas A; Montaldi D
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3080-93. PubMed ID: 22902538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
Voss JL; Paller KA
Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity in the striatum and hippocampus: Across-study convergence.
King DR; Chastelaine M; Elward RL; Wang TH; Rugg MD
Behav Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 354():1-7. PubMed ID: 28803854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures.
Duarte A; Ranganath C; Winward L; Hayward D; Knight RT
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Feb; 18(3):255-72. PubMed ID: 14741312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Manipulating the depth of processing reveals the relevance of second eye fixations for recollection but not familiarity.
Schwedes C; Scherer D; Wentura D
Psychol Res; 2020 Nov; 84(8):2237-2247. PubMed ID: 31236764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: an ERP perspective.
Friedman D; de Chastelaine M; Nessler D; Malcolm B
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():124-41. PubMed ID: 19914220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
