BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22898928)

  • 1. Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect?
    Putnam AL; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 22898928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing Boundary Conditions of the Testing Effect: On the Relative Efficacy of Covert vs. Overt Retrieval.
    Sundqvist ML; Mäntylä T; Jönsson FU
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1018. PubMed ID: 28680411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice.
    Smith MA; Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1712-25. PubMed ID: 23815513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal associative processes revealed by intrusions in paired-associate recall.
    Davis OC; Geller AS; Rizzuto DS; Kahana MJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 18605481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Putting action into testing: Enacted retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval.
    Kubik V; Jönsson FU; de Jonge M; Arshamian A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2093-2105. PubMed ID: 32686985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 19966244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?
    Abel M; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):347-359. PubMed ID: 29172560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Writing superiority in cued recall.
    Fueller C; Loescher J; Indefrey P
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():764. PubMed ID: 24151483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of delayed judgments of learning on retention.
    Tekin E; Roediger HL
    Metacogn Learn; 2021; 16(2):407-429. PubMed ID: 33679269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paradoxical effects of testing: repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall.
    McDermott KB
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 16752590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of retrieval on retention.
    Carrier M; Pashler H
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):633-42. PubMed ID: 1435266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent?
    Kellogg RT
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):415-28. PubMed ID: 17892086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes.
    Zaromb FM; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):995-1008. PubMed ID: 21156864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing visuospatial learning: the benefit of retrieval practice.
    Kang SH
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1009-17. PubMed ID: 21156865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval-induced forgetting and mental imagery.
    Saunders J; Fernandes M; Kosnes L
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):819-28. PubMed ID: 19679861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrieval practice decreases processing load of recall: Evidence revealed by pupillometry.
    Pajkossy P; Szőllősi Á; Racsmány M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():88-95. PubMed ID: 31301313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consolidation of episodic memories during sleep: long-term effects of retrieval practice.
    Racsmány M; Conway MA; Demeter G
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 20424027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrieval latency and "at-risk" memories.
    Madigan S; Neuse J; Roeber U
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 10946535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice.
    Racsmány M; Szőllősi Á; Marián M
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1161-1170. PubMed ID: 32418183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.